Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jf Ahern Co Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MHealth$223kYouth Development$81kHuman Services$71kAnimals$25kCrime & Legal$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S SPRINGS ACADEMY$1,000,000
AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$25,000
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$10,000
BADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST$7,500
YMCA OF FOND DU LAC$7,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC$5,000
ARC OF FOND DU LAC$2,500
STOUT UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - FDL CHAPTER$2,500
PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$2,500
CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%BEACON FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WI CHARITABLE FDN: $3k → 10%PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WI CHARITABLE FDN: $3k → 10%PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%Solution Center Shelter and Support Services Inc: $20k → 9%Professional Fire Fighters of WI Charitable Fdn: $1k → 10%Professional Fire Fighters of WI Charitable Fdn: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$1.6M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+6%

Still filing today

74%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +32%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    6× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +17%
  • BY
    BADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BF
    BEACON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • FD
    FOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -53%
  • SC
    SOLUTIONS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fond Du Lac Area United Way Inc

To unite individuals and organizations in a collaborative cost-effective effort to meet the human service needs of the community

Philanthropy
2
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
3
Uwm At Waukesha Foundation Inc

To raise scholarship money for students and raise the awareness of the campus and all of the activities on campus

—
4
Fond Du Lac Area Foundation

Creating a better community by promoting philanthropy, awarding effective grants, and providing leadership on important community issues today and forever.

—
5
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
6
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
7
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
8
Lake Superior State University Foundation

The Lake Superior State University Foundation exists for the sole purpose of promoting, receiving, managing, and disbursing donations and contributions for the benefit of Lake Superior State University.

Education
9
Southwest Wisconsin Technical College Foundation Inc

Provide scholarships and assistance to students and faculty for the primary benefit of southwest wisconsin technical college.

—
10
Madison Area Technical College Foundation Inc

The mission of madison area technical college foundation is to enrich lives and strengthen our community through the acquisition of private funding in support of high quality open access education at madison college.

Education
11
Waubonsee Community College Foundation

The waubonsee community college foundation was formed to advance the educational and charitable purposes of waubonsee community college. the primary objective of the foundation is to raise funds for student scholarships and educational…

Education
12
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS SPRINGS ACADEMY: $1,042,000 · OtherST MARYS SPRINGS ACADEMYAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · OtherAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCYMCA OF FOND DU LAC: $50,500 · Other+22 more: $221,000 · Other+22 moreMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $70,000 · EducationCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · EducationUW-STOUT FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationBEACON FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC: $28,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40,000 · HealthTHE ARC FOND DU LAC INC: $7,500 · HealthFOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 · AnimalsASTOP INC: $4,000 · Community ImprovementSOPHIA TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP PARTNERS INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,453,500Education$116,000Human Services$64,500Youth Development$52,000Health$47,500Animals$25,000Community Improvement$4,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $47,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC: $28,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBEACON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetFOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCOPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 over 6y, 35% of budgetMORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUWO-FOND DU LAC FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetSOLUTIONS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUW-STOUT FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFONDY FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC FOND DU LAC INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FOND DU LAC COUNTY INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASTOP INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOPHIA TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP PARTNERS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFREE SPIRIT RIDERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds BADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UWO-FOND DU LAC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UW-STOUT FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FONDY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC FOND DU LAC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FOND DU LAC COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASTOP INC ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP PARTNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fond Du Lac Area FoundationWI34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fond Du Lac Area Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Kevin and Connie Michels Family Foundation · Mid-States Aluminum Foundation Inc · Michels Family Foundation · Grande Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Sadoff Family Foundation · Mike Shannon Automotive Foundation Inc · Patrick & Marysue Michels Family Foundation · Agnesian Healthcare Inc · Fond Du Lac Area United Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jf Ahern Co Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jf Ahern Co Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jf Ahern’s filings →

    More from the funding graph