Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Studies Enrichment Inc

Jewish studies enrichment, inc.

$299k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MEducation$105kCommunity Improvement$30k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $214,110, the rows itemized in this filing. The $298,606 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $84,496 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
$15,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$221k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC$36,000
MIDRASH SHLOMO INC$32,500
HEALTH CUBED INC$30,000
YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC$21,500
YESHIVA NESIV HATALMUD INC$17,900
MESILOS BAIS YAKOV$16,500
CONGREGATION ANSHI FALLSBURG$15,600
SHIRAS CHAIM INC$10,000
CONGREGATION YESHIVA OHR HAMEIR$8,100
YESHIVA KETANA OF BENSONHURST$7,500
BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC$7,200
KEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY$6,210
YESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAIS MEDRASH ATERES SHLOMO: $20k → 9%CONGREGATION AHAVAS CHAVEIRIM: $36k → 14%CONG WOODRIDGE KOLLEL: $40k → 16%MESILOS BAIS YAKOV: $17k → 20%TEP: $19k → 8%CAMP TORAH INC: $500k → 16%KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $45k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH ATERES SHLOMO: $10k → 9%CONG ANSHEI FALLSBURG: $30k → 16%MESILOS BAIS YAKOV: $15k → 20%KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $36k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH ATERES SHLOMO: $10k → 9%CONG ANSHEI FALLSBURG: $20k → 16%MESILOS BAIS YAKOV: $11k → 20%YESHIVA NESIV HATALMUD INC: $28k → 11%CONGREGATION ANSHI FALLSBURG: $16k → 16%MESILOS BAIS YAKOV: $11k → 20%YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH: $27k → 11%CONG ANSHEI FALLSBURG: $15k → 16%MESILOS BAIS YAKOV: $10k → 20%YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC: $22k → 11%CONG WOODRIDGE KOLLEL: $15k → 16%YESHIVA NESIV HATALMUD INC: $18k → 11%CONG ANSHEI FALLSBURG: $10k → 16%YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH: $17k → 11%CONG WOODRIDGE KOLLEL: $10k → 16%AHAVAS CHESED: $21k → 20%YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH: $15k → 11%AHAVAS CHESED: $20k → 20%YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH: $14k → 11%AHAVAS CHESED: $17k → 20%YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH: $13k → 11%AHAVAS CHESED: $16k → 20%SEMINARY BNOS CHAIM: $12k → 11%AHAVAS CHESED: $14k → 20%SHIRAS CHAIM INC: $10k → 11%AHAVAS CHESED: $10k → 20%HEALTH CUBED INC: $30k → 20%YESHIVA GEDOLAH TEFERETH SHMUEL: $10k → 20%ELYON SEMINARY: $15k → 20%BAIS YAAKOV OF BENSONHURST: $29k → 20%BAIS YAAKOV OF BENSONHURST: $27k → 20%CONG BNEI PINCHOS: $10k → 20%MIDRASH SHLOMO INC: $33k → 20%YESHIVA KETANA OF BENSONHURST: $22k → 20%CONGREGATION SHAARE RAHAMIM: $20k → 20%CONGREGATION SHAARE RAHAMIM: $20k → 20%YESHIVA KETANA OF BENSONHURST: $14k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 19 repeat orgs$644k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$995k
$568k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YK
    YESHIVA KETANA OF BENSONHURST INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $138k
  • YC
    YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $111k
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KESER YISROEL MORDECHAI
    7× · 2017–2023 · $99k

Funded once

  • CT
    CAMP TORAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • EC
    ELYON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +220%
  • SB
    SEMINARY BNOS CHAIM A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
6
Yeshiva Gedolah Rabbinical College Inc

Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.

Education
7
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
8
Shemiras Sedorim Inc

Educational

Education
9
Talmudical Institute of Upstate New York

To train students in the skills required for understanding, studying and mastering the talmud and the considerable body of traditional jewish thought while seeking to help students build a world outlook drawn from the ethical and moral…

—
10
Bais Medrash Zichron Meir Inc

Beth medrash of asbury park inc is a religious undergraduate seminary that operates in ocean county.

Education
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Yeshivat Mekor Chaim Inc

High school, offering academic classes in english, history, math, and science, as well as a full array of courses in judaic studies and co-curricular activities such as physical education and classes in the arts.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kerem Bais Yaakov Seminary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Elyon College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP TORAH INC: $500,021 · OtherCAMP TORAH INCYESHIVA KETANA OF BENSONHURST INC: $138,000 · OtherYESHIVA KETANA OF BENSONHURST INCYESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC: $111,450 · OtherYESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INCCONGREGATION KESER YISROEL MORDECHAI: $98,650 · OtherCONGREGATION KESER YISROEL MORDECHAICONGREGATION ANSHI FALLSBURG: $90,600 · OtherCONGREGATION ANSHI FALLSBURGKOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $81,000 · OtherMESILAS BAIS YAAKOV: $79,000 · OtherCONGREGATION WOODRIDGE KOLLEL INC: $65,000 · Other+18 more: $398,740 · Other+18 moreELYON COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationSEMINARY BNOS CHAIM A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $11,911 · EducationBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $7,200 · EducationPASSAIC HEBREW INSTITUTE: $6,000 · EducationHEALTH CUBED INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementKEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY INC: $6,210 · Religion
Other$1,562,461Education$40,111Community Improvement$30,000Religion$6,210

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH CUBED INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetELYON COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSEMINARY BNOS CHAIM A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $11,911 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY INC: $6,210 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPASSAIC HEBREW INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH CUBED INC ↗
  • Who funds ELYON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SEMINARY BNOS CHAIM A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY INC ↗
  • Who funds PASSAIC HEBREW INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY47× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Kollel Zichron Avrohom Inc · Toras Chesed Inc · Sff Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Tifferet Moshe Inc · Dirshu International Inc · CCG Foundation a NJ Nonprofit Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Studies Enrichment Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Studies Enrichment Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jewish Studies Enrichment’s filings →

More from the funding graph