Skip to content
Jewish Federation of Volusia & Flagler Counties Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Volusia & Flagler Counties Inc

The organization serves three distinct missions which are a result of our philanthropic efforts: 1) to provide social services for families in need.

$732k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$819kInternational$369kReligion$234kMembership Benefit$169kArts & Culture$34k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $310,645, the rows itemized in this filing. The $732,180 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $421,535 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $266k
$14,364
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE$130,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$80,000
MT SINAI CEMETERY$56,020
THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$14,364
JEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC$11,911
US FRIENDS OF D'ROR ISRAEL$10,000
THE SHALOM SCHOOL CO TEMPLE BETH EL$8,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $81k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM OF PALM COAST: $25k → 9%US FRIENDS OF D'ROR ISRAEL: $36k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF DELAND: $25k → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $80k → 17%US FRIENDS OF D'ROR ISRAEL: $10k → 11%JEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $5k → 12%WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS AMERICAN SECTION INC: $33k → 17%CONGREGATION B'NAI TORAH: $51k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE: $130k → 17%JEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $5k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $163k → 17%TEMPLE BETH-EL - ORMOND BEACH: $50k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $160k → 17%JEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $5k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $145k → 17%JEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $12k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $140k → 17%JEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $5k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $110k → 17%THE SHALOM SCHOOL CO TEMPLE BETH EL: $8k → 12%AMEINU OUR PEOPLE INC: $75k → 17%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $56k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $74k → 17%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $51k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $14k → 17%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $13k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $13k → 17%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $12k → 12%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $12k → 12%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $12k → 12%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $10k → 12%MT SINAI CEMETERY: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$468k · 5 repeat orgs$338k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$468k
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+26%

Still filing today

80%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $169k · revenue +115% · 31% of their budget
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $161k · revenue -51%
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $58k

Funded once

  • AO
    AMEINU OUR PEOPLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +26%
  • OB
    ORMOND BEACH CONSERVATIVE JEWISH ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $51k
  • WJ
    WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC
    one grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
7
The Jerusalem Connection
—
8
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
9
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
11
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
12
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jewish Federations of North America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Heritage Festival Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $819,192 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCJEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $33,511 · PhilanthropyMOUNT SINAI CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $169,440 · OtherMOUNT SINAI CEMETERY ASSOC…TEMPLE BETH EL: $58,350 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELORMOND BEACH CONSERVATIVE JEWISH ASSOCIATION INC: $50,500 · OtherORMOND BEACH CONSERVATIVE …US FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL INC: $46,000 · OtherUS FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL …TEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DELAND: $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DELANDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $160,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF …FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $130,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAE…AMEINU OUR PEOPLE INC: $75,000 · ReligionWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $32,500 · Religion
Philanthropy$852,703Other$374,290International$290,500Religion$107,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $819,192 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $169,440 over 8y, 31% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $160,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $130,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMEINU OUR PEOPLE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL INC: $46,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC: $33,511 over 5y, 22% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $32,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Volusia & Flagler Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Federation of Volusia & Flagler Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Federation of Volusia & Flagler Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home