Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley

In order to unite, sustain, and enhance the lehigh valley community, and support jewish communities in israel and around the world, the JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY is dedicated to core values accomplished by raising and distributing funds to jewish and non-jewish charities in support of its core values.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$543k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$7.4MEducation$6.3MHuman Services$1.5MReligion$207k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $1,372,436, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,121,152 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,748,716 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$120,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA$543,436
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN$350,000
JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF ALLENTOWN PA$307,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$120,000
BETHLEHEM JEWISH COMMUNITY GRANT CONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM$25,000
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE HILLEL SOCIETY CO MUHLENBERG COLLEGE$12,500
HEBREW FAMILY LEAGUE$7,500
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY HILLEL SOCIETY CO LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $186k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $182k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $181k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $173k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $167k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $162k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $159k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $158k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $120k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$8.0M
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +29%
  • JD
    JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +34%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +114%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

    To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

    —
    2
    Yeshiva University

    The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

    Education
    3
    Hebrew College

    Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

    Education
    4
    Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

    Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

    —
    5
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

    To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

    Education
    6
    Abraham Joshua Heschel School

    The abraham joshua heschel school is an independent jewish day school which includes students from a wide range of jewish backgrounds, practices and beliefs. (see schedule o for continuation)

    Education
    7
    Irvine Hebrew Day School

    Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

    —
    8
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    9
    John Carroll University

    As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

    Education
    10
    Saint Joseph's University

    As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

    Education
    11
    Jewish Parent Cooperative School Inc

    Jcs is a parent participation elementary school, collaboratively governed by parents and teachers designed to foster a lifelong love of learning and meaningful connection to hashem.

    Education
    12
    Hillel At Florida International University

    Enrich the lives of jewish students

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Day School of the Lehigh Val; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Education Service of North America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $7,445,495 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN: $3,190,332 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER O…CONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM: $202,800 · OtherCONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM+4 more: $107,400 · OtherJEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL: $2,800,864 · EducationJEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF …MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $156,401 · Education+2 more: $29,500 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $1,488,200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAM…
    Philanthropy$7,445,495Other$3,500,532Education$2,986,765Human Services$1,488,200

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $7,445,495 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN: $3,190,332 over 9y, 11% of budgetJEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL: $2,800,864 over 9y, 24% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $1,488,200 over 9y, 24% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $156,401 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
    • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN ↗
    • Who funds JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL ↗
    • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
    • Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The R B Sabn FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The R B Sabn Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley’s filings →

      More from the funding graph