Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley

In order to unite, sustain, and enhance the lehigh valley community, and support jewish communities in israel and around the world, the JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY is dedicated to core values accomplished by raising and distributing funds to jewish and non-jewish charities in support of its core values.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$543k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$7.4MEducation$6.3MHuman Services$1.5MReligion$207k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $1,372,436 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,121,152 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,748,716 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$120,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA$543,436
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN$350,000
JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF ALLENTOWN PA$307,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$120,000
BETHLEHEM JEWISH COMMUNITY GRANT CONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM$25,000
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE HILLEL SOCIETY CO MUHLENBERG COLLEGE$12,500
HEBREW FAMILY LEAGUE$7,500
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY HILLEL SOCIETY CO LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $186k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $182k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $181k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $173k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $167k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $162k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $159k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $158k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $120k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.0M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$8.0M
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +29%
  • JD
    JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +34%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +114%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

    To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

    2
    Yeshiva University

    The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

    Education
    3
    Hebrew College

    Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

    Education
    4
    Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

    Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

    5
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

    To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

    Education
    6
    Abraham Joshua Heschel School

    The abraham joshua heschel school is an independent jewish day school which includes students from a wide range of jewish backgrounds, practices and beliefs. (see schedule o for continuation)

    Education
    7
    Irvine Hebrew Day School

    Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

    8
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    9
    John Carroll University

    As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

    Education
    10
    Saint Joseph's University

    As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

    Education
    11
    Jewish Parent Cooperative School Inc

    Jcs is a parent participation elementary school, collaboratively governed by parents and teachers designed to foster a lifelong love of learning and meaningful connection to hashem.

    Education
    12
    Hillel At Florida International University

    Enrich the lives of jewish students

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Day School of the Lehigh Val and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Education Service of North America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $7,445,495 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN — $3,190,332 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER O…CONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM — $202,800 · OtherCONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM+4 more — $107,400 · OtherJEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL — $2,800,864 · EducationJEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF …MUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $156,401 · Education+2 more — $29,500 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $1,488,200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAM…
    Philanthropy$7,445,495Other$3,500,532Education$2,986,765Human Services$1,488,200

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $7,445,495 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN — $3,190,332 over 9y, 11% of budgetJEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL — $2,800,864 over 9y, 24% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $1,488,200 over 9y, 24% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $156,401 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC
    • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN
    • Who funds JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE LEHIGH VAL
    • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY
    • Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE
    • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The R B Sabn FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The R B Sabn Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Jewish Federation of the Lehigh Valley funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph