Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of the Berkshires

The JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES cares for those in need and nurtures and sustains the jewish community locally, in israel and around the world today and for future generations.

$660k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$282k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of Jewish Federation of the Berkshires’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Jewish Federations Of North America Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
3
’18
4
’19
6
’20
4
’21
8
’22
5
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.9MReligion$531kCivil Rights$102kEducation$23kInternational$20kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $378,238, the rows itemized in this filing. The $659,704 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $281,466 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $76k
  • $250k+1 grant · $282k
$13,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$282,338
HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE$31,500
CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL$20,000
HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST$13,750
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$11,000
TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM$7,500
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$7,000
YIDDISH BOOK CENTER$5,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST: $14k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $19k → 12%THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $26k → 16%AMERICAN JOINT DISTRIBUTION: $20k → 17%HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST: $10k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $11k → 12%THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $25k → 16%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $7k → 17%HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST: $7k → 12%TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $9k → 12%THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20k → 16%HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST: $7k → 12%TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $8k → 12%THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $11k → 16%HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST: $7k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH ISREAL: $8k → 12%THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $8k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $448k → 17%HILLEL AT UMASS AMHERST: $7k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $282k → 17%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $28k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $266k → 17%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $28k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $193k → 17%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $24k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $192k → 17%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $20k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $176k → 17%TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $14k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $144k → 17%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $12k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $134k → 17%TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY HEBREW AFTERSCHOOL INITIATIVE (CHAI): $10k → 12%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $8k → 12%TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $8k → 12%CHABAD OF THE BERKSHIRES: $8k → 12%COMMUNITY HEBREW AFTERSCHOOL INITIATIVE (CHAI): $7k → 12%CONGREGATION KNESSET ISRAEL: $7k → 12%TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $7k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $54k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $39k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $32k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $29k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $22k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $17k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $13k → 12%HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 9 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +129% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$633k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+129%
-9%

Still filing today

22%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $216k
  • KI
    KNESSET ISRAEL CONGREGATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $115k
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $88k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -9%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL BETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

—
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
6
Hillel At Florida International University

Enrich the lives of jewish students

—
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
Jewish Institute for National Security of America

The jewish institute for national security of america (jinsa) was founded in 1976 as a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to advancing u.s. national security interests in the middle east, of which a critical pillar is a robust…

International
9
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
10
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc

Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…

Religion
11
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
12
Mesorah Heritage Foundation

The foundation's mission is to research, locate, translate, and create jewish religious, literary, biblical, and talmudic works for religious, scholarly and cultural purposes for the general public.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation Council of Greater La; the most unlike its peers is Laren Montessori School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,835,241 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC+1 more: $17,777 · PhilanthropyHEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE INC: $216,086 · OtherHEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSH…KNESSET ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $114,589 · OtherKNESSET ISRAEL CONGREGATI…TEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIM: $85,319 · OtherTEMPLE ANSHE AMUNIMHILLEL HOUSE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MASS AT AMHERST: $62,950 · OtherHILLEL HOUSE AT THE UNIVE…Individual grant recipient: $19,665 · Other+8 more: $74,200 · Other+8 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $88,073 · Civil RightsThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $20,000 · InternationalNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $5,150 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$1,853,018Other$572,809Civil Rights$88,073International$20,000Arts & Culture$5,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,835,241 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $88,073 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL HOUSE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MASS AT AMHERST: $62,950 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $17,777 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $5,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL HOUSE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MASS AT AMHERST ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harold Grinspoon FoundationMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Federation of the Berkshires funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Federation of the Berkshires. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jewish Federation of the Berkshires’ filings →

More from the funding graph