Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc

To cultivate a vibrant, healthy jewish community, inspire greater jewish identity, and promote deeper understanding and stronger connections between jews and non-jews in reading/berks county.

$159k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$27k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Jewish Federations Of North America Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $88k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
6
’18
5
’20
5
’21
4
’22
3
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$959kReligion$99kInternational$74kFood & Nutrition$58kEducation$56kArts & Culture$36kHuman Services$20k
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $88,190, the rows itemized in this filing. The $158,689 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $70,499 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
$15,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRATZ COLLEGE$26,607
REFORM CONGREGATION OHEB SHOLOM$21,000
UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY$15,400
MEIR PANIM$14,883
READING PUBLIC MUSEUM$5,300
READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 69% of Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 21%.

Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$398k · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2018, 2 since wound down. Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$398k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+47%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $82k · revenue +38%
  • II
    IMPACTISRAEL INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $74k · revenue +35%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +316%

Funded once

  • SM
    SOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +47%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR READING AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc

To cultivate a vibrant, healthy jewish community, inspire greater jewish identity, and promote deeper understanding and stronger connections between jews and non-jews in reading/berks county.

—
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the princeton symphony orchestra is to leverage the power of live music to uplift the human experience.

Arts & Culture
9
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
10
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
11
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reading Symphony Orchestra Association; the most unlike its peers is The Jewish Federations of North America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $876,769 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC: $81,950 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INCREFORM CONGREGATION OHEB SHOLOM: $76,600 · OtherREFORM CONGRE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $57,883 · OtherAMERICAN FRIE…CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF BERKS COUNT INC: $22,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVI…IMPACTISRAEL INC: $74,000 · InternationalGRATZ COLLEGE: $50,148 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR READING AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationREADING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR THE READING PUBLIC MUSEUM: $10,600 · Arts & CultureSOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA: $20,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$958,719Other$156,483International$74,000Education$56,148Arts & Culture$35,600Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $876,769 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC: $81,950 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $74,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $57,883 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGRATZ COLLEGE: $50,148 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetREADING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE READING PUBLIC MUSEUM: $10,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR READING AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BERKS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM ↗
  • Who funds GRATZ COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH MOUNTAIN YMCA ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE READING PUBLIC MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR READING AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berks County Community Foundation IncPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berks County Community Foundation Inc · Marlin Miller Jr Family Foundation · Henry Janssen Foundation · Penn Entertainment Foundation · The Breidegam Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Federation of Reading Pa Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Federation of Reading Pa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph