· Public charity
Jewish Federation of Detroit
The JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT is the cornerstone of our jewish community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $116k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $709k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+19 grants · $44M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION OF DETROIT | $7,701,190 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $6,246,455 |
| JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL | $4,899,566 |
| GESHER HUMAN SERVICES | $4,551,064 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE | $3,926,424 |
| FRESH AIR SOCIETY | $3,069,900 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $3,007,348 |
| YESHIVA BETH YEHUDAH | $2,070,941 |
| THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA | $1,273,975 |
| FARBER HEBREW DAY SCHOOL - YESHIVAT AKIVA | $1,261,104 |
| JEWISH SENIOR LIFE OF METRO DETROIT | $1,210,666 |
| HILLEL DAY SCHOOL | $1,161,675 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND | $985,000 |
| YESHIVAS DARCHEI TORAH | $694,746 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - HILLEL | $527,080 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $86.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Jewish Federation of Detroit’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JAJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL9× · 2017–2025 · $46M · revenue +147% · 37% of their budget
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE9× · 2017–2025 · $45M · revenue +168% · 35% of their budget
- GHGESHER HUMAN SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $32M · revenue +54% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- WFWEXNER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $350k · revenue +20%
- VBV'HECHZAKTA BOone grant, 2021 · $296k · revenue -21%
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $232k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.
Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Wexner Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds JSL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRESH AIR SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds THE JARC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds KADIMA ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD ORT INC ↗
- Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
- Who funds WEXNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds V'HECHZAKTA BO ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Edward and Norma Jean Meer Charitable Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Jewish Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Detroit funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Adamah Inc — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.