Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Greater Buffalo Inc

Guided by Jewish values, the federation convenes, inspires, collaborates, leads and enriches the jewish community locally and around the world.

$2.4M
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$558k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172018.

Human Services$971kPhilanthropy$581kEducation$152kOther$843k
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $1,443,019 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,449,597 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,006,578 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $498k
  • $250k+2 grants · $848k
$73,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$558,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA$289,619
BUREAU OF JEWISH ED (& YAD B'YAD)$245,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$110,000
JEWISH HERITAGE SCHOOLOHR TEMIMIM$73,400
HILLELJEWISH STUDENT CAMPUS SVS$70,000
KADIMAH SCHOOL OF BUFFALO INC$36,000
HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER$26,000
CHABAD HOUSE OF BUFFALO$20,000
CEMETERY CORPORATION$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $971k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $558k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $193k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $110k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $110k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$2.0M
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BUFFALO INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $751k · revenue +59%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $220k · revenue +378%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE DAY SCHOOL OF BUFFALO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $152k · revenue +2%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    University of Judaism Foundation
    2
    Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
    Philanthropy
    3
    Hillel at Binghamton Inc

    Hillel at Binghamton seeks to empower Jewish students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world through cultural, educational, social, and religious programs and activities on campus. Hillel envisions a world where every…

    4
    Jewish Center for Justice

    Founded in 2017, the Jewish Center for Justice (JCJ) is a distinguished social justice, education, and leadership development platform that meets each individual where they are in their journey to inspire change. JCJ's mission is to…

    Human Services
    5
    Jewish Home Lifecare

    Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

    6
    Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

    Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

    7
    Jewish Life Foundation
    8
    Ccf New York Jewish French Community Center of Ny Inc

    To further French Jewish Culture, help integration of American in France and French in USA concerning Jewish Culture

    Religion
    9
    Fund for Jewish Education Inc
    Philanthropy
    10
    The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
    Philanthropy
    11
    Jewish Federation of Greater Clifton-Passaic
    12
    Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

    KU Hillel's mission is to connect Jewish students to each other and to their Judaism, to inspire and equip the next generation of Jewish leaders, and to build a thriving Jewish community on campus.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holocaust Resource Center of BuffaloInc and the most unlike its peers is The Jewish Federations of North America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BUFFALO INC — $751,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BUFFALO …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORK — $220,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORKBureau Of Jewish Education of Greater Buffalo Inc — $500,000 · OtherBureau Of Jewish Education of Greater…Hillel Foundation For Jewish Life — $140,000 · OtherHillel Foundation For Jewish LifeKadimah School of Buffalo Inc — $81,100 · OtherKadimah School of Buffalo IncHolocaust Resource Center of BuffaloInc — $52,000 · OtherHolocaust Resource Center of BuffaloI…BAIS LUBAVITCH INC — $40,000 · OtherJewish Federation Of Greater Buffalo Cemetery Corporation — $30,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $580,500 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF…JEWISH HERITAGE DAY SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $151,880 · Education
    Human Services$971,000Other$843,100Philanthropy$580,500Education$151,880

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BUFFALO INC — $751,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $580,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBureau Of Jewish Education of Greater Buffalo Inc — $500,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTERN NEW YORK — $220,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE DAY SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $151,880 over 2y, 10% of budgetHillel Foundation For Jewish Life — $140,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetKadimah School of Buffalo Inc — $81,100 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetHolocaust Resource Center of BuffaloInc — $52,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetJewish Federation Of Greater Buffalo Cemetery Corporation — $30,000 over 2y, 20% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Greater Buffalo Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph