Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Atlantic and Cape May Counties

Provide for jewish continuity in our community, across the country, around the world, and in the state of israel.

$448k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$798kPhilanthropy$366kEducation$269kHealth$179kArts & Culture$97kReligion$30k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $239,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $448,055 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $209,055 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$60,000
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH A$54,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$40,000
BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION$38,250
BERON JOAS$36,750
JEWISH COMMUNITY VOICE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BERON JOAS: $55k → 11%BERON JOAS: $37k → 11%BERON JOAS: $26k → 11%BERON JOAS: $21k → 11%BERON JOAS: $21k → 11%BERON JOAS: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$1.4M
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Recreation & SportsReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $474k · revenue +38%
  • JC
    Jewish Community Center of Atlantic County
    6× · 2017–2022 · $324k · revenue +38%
  • BO
    Board of Jewish Education of Atlantic Co
    6× · 2017–2022 · $269k · revenue -22% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/6
    Grantees still filing
    3/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY INC: $474,485 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUN…STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $96,775 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITYJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL: $30,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $366,301 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS …Jewish Community Center of Atlantic County: $323,544 · Recreation & SportsJewish Community Cent…Board of Jewish Education of Atlantic Co: $269,149 · ReligionBoard of Jewish E…JEWISH OLDER ADULT SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY: $179,406 · Human ServicesJEWISH OLDE…
    Other$601,260Philanthropy$366,301Recreation & Sports$323,544Religion$269,149Human Services$179,406

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY INC: $474,485 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $366,301 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Center of Atlantic County: $323,544 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetBoard of Jewish Education of Atlantic Co: $269,149 over 6y, 44% of budgetJEWISH OLDER ADULT SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY: $179,406 over 6y, 10% of budgetJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Katz H L FndnMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Katz H L Fndn · Brickman-Gross Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Atlantic and Cape May Counties funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Federation of Atlantic and Cape May Counties. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
    • Jewish Family Services of Atlantic County Inc: 6% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $544k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Federation of Atlantic and Cape May Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph