Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City

To build a strong, vibrant, and inclusive community that enhances wellness, meaning, and joy, based on jewish values, heritage, and culture.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Crime & Legal$8.1MPhilanthropy$731kReligion$162kHuman Services$111kCivil Rights$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$105,295
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHARITABLE SUPPORTING FOUNDATION$1,395,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$105,295
GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - REAT GRIFFIN UNDERWOOD DAF$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $101k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas Citylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City

The mission of the jewish community foundation of greater kansas city is to promote the practice of tzedakah (righteousness, charity) and the pursuit of tikkun olam (repairing the world) by serving as the central resource and advocate for…

Philanthropy
2
Mid-Kansas Jewish Federation Inc

Build, strengthen, and preserve jewish identity within the local community, in israel, and around the world through tzedakah, education, and cultural events.

Religion
3
Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City

To build a strong, vibrant, and inclusive community that enhances wellness, meaning, and joy, based on jewish values, heritage, and culture.

Philanthropy
4
Vaad Hakashruth of Kansas City Inc

To provide proper supervison of kosher foods for the kansas city jewish community & assure that products are prepared in accordance with jewish law.

Religion
5
Community Kollel of Kansas City Inc

The Kollels purpose is to provide Jewish education and to encourage, supervise and enlightenpeople in Jewish texts, culture and knowledge.

Religion
6
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
7
Lowenstein Family Supporting Foundation

The organization is designed to provide support for other charitable organizations as described in section 501(c) and sections 509(a) of the internal revenue code. the organization is exclusively for charitable, educational, or religious…

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Community Centers Association of North America

Jcc association strengthens jewish life in north america through direct service to affiliate jccs, ym-ywha's and camps and by providing leadership and guidance to the jcc movement. in addition, we serve jewish personnel in the armed forces…

Human Services
9
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
10
Great Jobs Kc Inc

The mission of great jobs kc is to provide access to college scholarships and tuition-free job training along with job placement assistance to secure family-sustaining jobs for low- to modest-income individuals in the kansas city area.

Education
11
Menorah Heritage Foundation

The organization is designed to provide support for other charitable organizations as described in sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a) of the internal revenue code. the organization is operated exclusively for charitable, educational or…

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Foundation of Greater New Haven Inc

The jewish foundation of greater new haven's mission is to solicit and properly manage current and new charitable endowments and planned gifts for organizations in greater new haven so that there will be permanent and ongoing funding for…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City and the most unlike its peers is Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHARITABLE SUPPORTING FOUNDATION — $8,117,567 · Crime & LegalJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHARITABLE SUPPORTING FOUNDATIONGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $400,000 · PhilanthropyGreater K…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $320,942 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FE…+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $161,811 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC — $100,640 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesSEVENDAYS INC — $10,000 · Religion
Crime & Legal$8,117,567Philanthropy$730,942Other$161,811Human Services$110,640Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHARITABLE SUPPORTING FOUNDATION — $8,117,567 over 8y, 71% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $320,942 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $161,811 over 1y, 29% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC — $100,640 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEMA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEVENDAYS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas CityKS15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · White Family Supporting Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph