Skip to content
Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
72
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Civil Rights$4.2MPhilanthropy$2.9MHuman Services$2.2MHealth$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.1MEnvironment$1.0MPublic Benefit$1.0MArts & Culture$937kOther$0
02FY2024 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $1.7M
$40,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NDN Collective$100,000
Borealis Philanthropy$100,000
Common Counsel Foundation$100,000
Ministers and Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Churches$75,000
Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York$75,000
St Charles Hospital$75,000
Indigenous Environmental Network$75,000
Progressive Multiplier Fund$75,000
Common Counsel Foundation$75,000
Seven Dancers Coalition Inc$60,000
Friends of the Akwesasne Freedom School$60,000
MICA Group Inc$60,000
Coahoma County Diaper Bank$50,000
SEPA Mujer$50,000
Mississippi Votes$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Newburgh LGBTQ Center: $55k → 14%Ekvnv Yefolecvlke: $10k → 18%Native Wellness Institute: $60k → 12%Chief Seattle Club: $25k → 9%Ecumenical Coalition for Women and Families: $60k → 19%Mississippi Families for Kids: $10k → 23%Tutwiler Community Education Center: $10k → 31%Legacy Village: $30k → 35%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $60k → 11%Newburgh LGBTQIA Center: $50k → 14%Native Wellness Institute: $50k → 12%Chief Seattle Club: $25k → 9%Tutwiler Community Education Center: $10k → 31%Newburgh LGBTQ Center: $45k → 14%Village at Ithaca: $40k → 16%Native Wellness Institute: $50k → 12%Chief Seattle Club: $25k → 9%Tutwiler Community Education Center: $10k → 31%Newburgh LGBTQ Center: $25k → 14%Village at Ithaca: $30k → 16%Native Wellness Institute: $25k → 12%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $50k → 11%Newburgh LGBTQIA Center: $25k → 14%Village at Ithaca: $10k → 16%Native Wellness Institute: $25k → 12%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $40k → 11%The Village at Ithaca: $60k → 16%Native Wellness Institute: $25k → 12%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $40k → 11%Village at Ithaca: $40k → 16%Native Wellness Institute: $25k → 12%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $40k → 11%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $25k → 11%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $25k → 11%Columbia County Sanctuary Movement: $10k → 11%Coahoma Collective: $10k → 36%YWCA of the USA: $10k → 14%Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara Counties Inc: $50k → 13%Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara Counties Inc: $50k → 13%Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara Counties Inc: $50k → 13%Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara Counties Inc: $25k → 13%Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara Counties Inc: $25k → 13%Women's Foundation of Mississippi: $30k → 23%New York State Youth Leadership Council: $30k → 17%New York State Youth Leadership Council: $30k → 17%New York State Youth Leadership Council: $30k → 17%New York State Youth Leadership Council: $30k → 17%New York State Youth Leadership Council: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
CT
CA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 103 repeat orgs$967k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

103 repeat relationships: 61 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
42

Total granted

$16M
$918k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+25%

Still filing today

79%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $620k · revenue +132%
  • NF
    Neighborhood Funders Group
    5× · 2019–2023 · $395k · revenue +398%
  • OV
    One Voice
    6× · 2019–2024 · $388k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • FC
    FOREVER CARING EVONNE
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • GF
    Goodnation Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +62%
  • EC
    Ecumenical Coalition for Women and Families
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
2
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
3
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
6
New Disabled South Rising Inc

New Disabled South Rising is the advocacy arm of New Disabled South focusing on poverty and care, criminalization and democracy.

Civil Rights
7
Next River

Next River is an institute for practicing the future. We cultivate the research, narratives, practices, and connections that transform our cultural landscape toward collective liberation.

Social Science
8
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
9
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
10
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
11
Communities Rise

Communities Rise fosters movements to build power in communities impacted by systemic oppression. To create an equitable system, we pursue cross-sector collaboration, and provide capacity building and legal services for community…

Crime & Legal
12
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mississippi Immigrant Rights Allian. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/126
Grantees still filing
86/126
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINISTERS AND MISSIONARIES BENEFIT BOARD OF THE AMERICAN BAPTIST CHUR: $450,000 · OtherNeighborhood Funders Group: $395,000 · OtherPROJECT SOUTH INC: $350,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FUNDS INC: $337,500 · OtherHaudonosaunee Coalition for Womens Inc: $333,500 · OtherOne Voice: $388,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI WORKERS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $368,500 · Other+81 more: $7,097,500 · Other+81 moreCOLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT INC: $293,500 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA C…NATIVE WELLNESS INSTITUTE: $267,000 · Human ServicesNATIVE WEL…NEWBURGH LGBTQIA CENTER: $203,500 · Human ServicesNEWBURGH L…Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara County Inc: $200,000 · Human ServicesNative Ame…THE VILLAGE AT ITHACA INC: $180,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAG…NEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK S…CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $78,500 · Human ServicesEcumenical Coalition for Women and Families: $60,000 · Human Services+12 more: $227,500 · Human Services+12 moreMISSISSIPPI VOTES: $303,500 · Civil RightsMISSISSIP…MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION: $276,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIP…Transgender Law Center: $240,000 · Civil RightsTransgend…BYP100 Education Fund: $210,000 · Civil RightsBYP100 Ed…PROVIDE INC: $170,000 · Civil RightsPROVIDE I…RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $140,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO …GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE: $101,500 · Civil RightsGRASSROOT…+7 more: $152,500 · Civil Rights+7 moreCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $510,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON CO…NDN COLLECTIVE INC: $320,000 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLE…NEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC: $220,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ECONO…Higher Purpose Hub: $166,000 · Community ImprovementHigher Pu…BLACK FARMER FUND INC: $150,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK FAR…COMMON FUTURE: $140,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FU…Native American food sovereignty alliance dba NAFSA: $78,500 · Community ImprovementHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $620,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR COALITION OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $496,623 · EnvironmentSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND: $110,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $110,000 · EnvironmentTaproot Earth: $60,000 · Environment+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $205,000 · EducationSouthern Echo Inc: $189,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE AKWESASNE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC: $160,000 · EducationSTEPS COALITION: $160,000 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC: $112,500 · EducationPLEIADES NETWORK INC: $103,500 · EducationLOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE: $100,000 · EducationUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $60,000 · Education+2 more: $40,000 · EducationMICA GROUP INC: $233,500 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY: $160,000 · Arts & CultureOnkwe Inc: $153,500 · Arts & CultureMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR CULTURAL PRODUCTION: $150,000 · Arts & CultureCROSSROADS CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: $147,500 · Arts & CultureYOUTH INNOVATION MOVEMENT SOLUTIONS: $112,500 · Arts & CultureThe Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation: $90,000 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS VALUES INITIATIVE INC: $53,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$9,720,000Human Services$1,660,000Civil Rights$1,593,500Community Improvement$1,584,500Environment$1,406,623Education$1,130,500Arts & Culture$1,104,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $620,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $510,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLEAN AIR COALITION OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $496,623 over 6y, 26% of budgetNeighborhood Funders Group: $395,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetOne Voice: $388,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetMISSISSIPPI WORKERS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $368,500 over 6y, 20% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $350,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHaudonosaunee Coalition for Womens Inc: $333,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $320,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VOTES: $303,500 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP: $300,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT INC: $293,500 over 6y, 41% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION: $276,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $273,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSEPA MUJER INC: $273,500 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $240,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMICA GROUP INC: $233,500 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCommunity Voices Heard Inc: $220,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC: $220,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetFREEDOM PROJECT NETWORK: $215,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetBYP100 Education Fund: $210,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCoahoma County Diaper Bank Diaper Bank of the Delta: $206,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $205,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNEWBURGH LGBTQIA CENTER: $203,500 over 5y, 52% of budgetNative American Community Services of Erie and Niagara County Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC: $190,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIAJE: $190,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT: $190,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetINDIGENOUS WORLD ORGANIZATION: $190,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetSouthern Echo Inc: $189,500 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetWorker Justice Center of New York Inc: $180,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetTHE VILLAGE AT ITHACA INC: $180,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDE INC: $170,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetAIDS SERVICES COALITION INC: $170,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetInstitute for the Advancement of Minority Health: $166,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetHigher Purpose Hub: $166,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE AKWESASNE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC: $160,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSTEPS COALITION: $160,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $160,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY: $160,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $156,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOnkwe Inc: $153,500 over 4y, 52% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND: $150,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHudson Catskill Housing Coalition: $150,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetST CHARLES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetNEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $150,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $150,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR COALITION OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Funders Group ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI WORKERS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Haudonosaunee Coalition for Womens Inc ↗
  • Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI VOTES ↗
  • Who funds ST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPA MUJER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE WELLNESS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
  • Who funds MICA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Voices Heard Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM PROJECT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds Coahoma County Diaper Bank Diaper Bank of the Delta ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NEWBURGH LGBTQIA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IAJE ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS WORLD ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Echo Inc ↗
  • Who funds Worker Justice Center of New York Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE AT ITHACA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds AIDS SERVICES COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for the Advancement of Minority Health ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Common Counsel Founda…Borealis PhilanthropyTides FoundationRsf Social Finance IncGroundswell FundNovo FoundationSurdna Foundation IncNew York FoundationWK Kellogg FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…The Ford Foundation
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC64.7× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Tides Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Groundswell Fund · Novo Foundation · Surdna Foundation Inc · New York Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Ford Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jessie Smith Noyes’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home