Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jenn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$56kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$21kHousing & Shelter$13kAnimals$12kEducation$10kReligion$8kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$585k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Scecina Memorial High School$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Wheeler Mission$1,500
Little Sisters of the Poor$1,000
Indianapolis Zoo$1,000
Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Indianapolis Municipal Band$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Joys House: $1k → 16%Outreach: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $2k → 16%Wheeler Mission: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 21 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +117% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$156k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+16%

Still filing today

24%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +180%
  • WM
    WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +117%
  • HH
    HAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • HS
    Human Society Hamilton Co
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • RC
    Riley Childrens Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • BC
    Bethany Christian Church
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
2
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition
3
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
4
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition
5
Meals On Wheels Chicago

Our mission is to ensure that Chicago seniors and people with disabilities benefit from nutritious meal programs that improve their quality of life and maximize independence.

Food & Nutrition
6
Meals On Wheels of Northwest Indiana Inc

We prepare and deliver essential nutritious meals to our community, promoting health, wellness, and independence of all, with the support of a diverse and engaged community network.

—
7
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
The Arc of Northwest Indiana Inc

Mission is to provide necessary resources to persons with disabilities in order to assist them in enhancing their daily lives. we provide pre-vocational training, habilitation services, individual support, and employment services based on…

Human Services
10
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
11
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
12
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is Urban Music Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $48,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INCAssistance League: $12,000 · OtherAssistance LeagueIndianapolis Symphony Orchestra: $11,000 · OtherIndianapolis Symphony OrchestraFATHER THOMAS SCECINA MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL INC: $8,500 · OtherFATHER THOMAS SCECINA MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL INCIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIANAPOLIS MUNICIPAL BAND INC: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherUnited Christmas Service: $5,000 · Other+22 more: $36,750 · Other+22 moreWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTMP Enterprises Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $6,000 · AnimalsMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN MUSIC THEATRE INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureHANCOCK HOPE HOUSE INC: $1,300 · Housing & Shelter
Other$144,250Human Services$12,500Recreation & Sports$7,000Animals$6,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Arts & Culture$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $48,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHANCOCK HOPE HOUSE INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTMP Enterprises Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN MUSIC THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds HANCOCK HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TMP Enterprises Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · The Saltsburg Fund Charitable Trust Xxxxx4005 · Arthur Jordan Foundation · Samerian Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jenn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jenn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jenn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph