Skip to content
JEMP-D Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

JEMP-D Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$412kCommunity Improvement$228kEnvironment$179kPhilanthropy$142kEducation$95kCivil Rights$68kPublic Benefit$37kHousing & Shelter$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$345k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACT INC$28,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI$20,000
SPRING STREET CLIMATE FUND INC$15,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$12,000
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUALEXPLOITATION$10,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC$10,000
BEAR SPOT FOUNDATION FOR EQUINE FACILITATED PSYCHO$8,000
WOMEN IN NEED INC$6,000
SPECIAL SPIRIT INC$5,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$4,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY$3,000
PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC$2,000
NATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC$2,000
ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA RESEARCHFOUNDATION$2,000
BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $5k → 9%GEOGRAPHY OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $5k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $3k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $2k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $1k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $1k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $1k → 9%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $500 → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $9k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $7k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $6k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $5k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $4k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 36 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
21

Total granted

$1.2M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+31%

Still filing today

94%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    IMPACT INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $216k · revenue +111%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $164k · revenue +40%
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • CA
    CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -15%
  • WI
    WORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • CP
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
12
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Road Runners Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/53
Grantees still filing
43/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $163,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DIS…Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $104,500 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's H…BEAR SPOT FOUNDATION FOR EQUINE FACILITATED PSYCHOTHERAPY INC: $54,500 · HealthBEAR SPOT FOUNDATION FOR EQUINE F…SPECIAL SPIRIT INC: $36,500 · HealthSPECIAL SPIRIT INCTHE ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $21,000 · HealthTHE ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA RESE…+2 more: $2,500 · HealthIMPACT INC: $216,000 · Community ImprovementIMPACT INC+1 more: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSPRING STREET CLIMATE FUND INC: $62,000 · EnvironmentSPRING STREET C…FOUNDATION FOR NEW YORKS STRONGEST INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentFOUNDATION FOR …350ORG: $34,000 · Environment350ORGNATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL AREAS C…+3 more: $8,000 · EnvironmentFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING P…FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $58,500 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR T…Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation: $44,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $27,000 · Civil RightsRIDERS ALLIANCE FUND INC: $13,000 · Civil RightsDemocracy North Carolina: $10,000 · Civil RightsTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO: $22,000 · EducationBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $14,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $7,500 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College: $7,000 · EducationWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 · EducationCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $3,500 · EducationTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationGREAT LAKES ACADEMY INC: $2,300 · Education+3 more: $3,000 · EducationONEGOAL: $22,500 · OtherONEGOALTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC: $12,000 · OtherTRANSPORTATION ALTE…CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $8,000 · OtherWOMEN IN NEED INC: $33,000 · OtherWOMEN IN NEED INCNORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $18,000 · OtherNORTHERN MICHIGAN E…ONEGOAL: $27,000 · OtherONEGOALNEO Philanthropy Inc: $23,500 · OtherNEO Philanthropy In…PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $19,500 · OtherPROSPECT PARK ALLIA…FORT GREENE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $21,000 · OtherFORT GREENE PARK CO…LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Other+14 more: $30,600 · Other+14 more
Health$382,500Community Improvement$221,000Environment$178,000Philanthropy$118,500Civil Rights$94,000Education$67,800Other$224,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPACT INC: $216,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $163,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $104,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING STREET CLIMATE FUND INC: $62,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $58,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR SPOT FOUNDATION FOR EQUINE FACILITATED PSYCHOTHERAPY INC: $54,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR NEW YORKS STRONGEST INC: $50,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetChicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation: $44,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL SPIRIT INC: $36,500 over 7y, 5.8% of budget350ORG: $34,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $33,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetONEGOAL: $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC: $24,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $23,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFORT GREENE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $21,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $18,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRIDERS ALLIANCE FUND INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES ACADEMY INC: $2,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDFLOWER NEW YORK CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Communit…Lily Auchincloss Foun…Brooklyn Community Fo…Jewish Communal FundThe Jm Kaplan Fund IncBoston Foundation IncThe Rockefeller Found…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Seed Fund Grants …Van Ameringen Foundat…American Express Foun…The Chicago Community…
The New York Community TrustNY18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Seed Fund Grants Inc · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JEMP-D Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JEMP-D Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Impact Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to JEMP-D Foundation?

Find your warmest path to JEMP-D Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on JEMP-D’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home