Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jej Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Animals$122kHuman Services$69kHealth$25kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION$50,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$20,000
HOPE MINISTRIES$20,000
MERCY CHEFS$15,000
CHILDREN & FAMILIES SERVICES - IOWA$10,000
CHILD SERVE$5,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$5,000
DMARC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
AHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT$2,500
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MERCY CHEFS: $15k → 20%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $23k → 10%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Jej Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in IA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jej Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$138k · 3 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$138k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+46%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PJ
    PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $119k · revenue -14%
  • CI
    CHILDSERVE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +125%
  • MA
    MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k

Funded once

  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +14%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF IOWAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +46%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

3
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
4
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
7
Foodshare Inc

Foodshare is leading an informed, coordinated response to hunger as part of the overall community effort to alleviate poverty in hartford and tolland counties.

8
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Every Meal

Every meal's mission is to fight child hunger through community and school partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
10
Hospice of North Iowa

We, mercy health services - iowa and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. hospice of north iowa is a member of mercy health services - iowa…

Human Services
11
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Chefs Inc and the most unlike its peers is AHEINZ57 Pet Rescue & Transport Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION — $119,000 · Human ServicesPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATIONHOPE MINISTRIES — $20,000 · Human ServicesHOPE MINISTRIESMERCY CHEFS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesMERCY CHEFS INCCHILDSERVE INC — $16,000 · OtherCHILDSERVE INCCHILDREN & FAMILIES SERVICES - IOWA — $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN & FAMILIES SE…SHARE OUR STRENGTH — $8,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHDMARC — $4,000 · OtherDMARCMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER — $3,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CEN…Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recip…+1 more — $1,000 · OtherGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINI…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $2,500 · Food & NutritionAHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT INC — $2,500 · Animals
Human Services$154,000Other$44,500Philanthropy$20,000Health$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Animals$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION — $119,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDSERVE INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

United Way WorldwideVA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jej Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jej Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jej Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph