· Private foundation
Jeffrey Schrager & Anne York Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of JEFFREY SCHRAGER & ANNE YORK FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOSELYN ART MUSEUM | $21,000 |
| CAMERON ART MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC | $6,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC - THE HOWLEY ASPIRE PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| TEMPLE OF ISRAEL (WILMINGTON) | $1,870 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MIDLANDS | $1,005 |
| UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC | $1,000 |
| UC BERKELEY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| TEMPLE ISRAEL OF OMAHA | $1,000 |
| PHI KAPPA PSI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION | $1,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA | $1,000 |
| PIE LAB (WILMINGTON) | $593 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LWLOUISE WELLS CAMERON ART MUSEUM6× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +3%
- CUCreighton University2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +48%
- TETHE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY7× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- PLPIE LAB OMAHA (NHC NAACP YOUTH AND COLLEGE ACT-SO)one grant, 2018 · $4k
- BMBURGWIN-WRIGHT MUSEUMone grant, 2019 · $4k
- WSWillie Stargell Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…
Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.
Cisnc's mission is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. cisnc serves as the backbone for its statewide network of 20 independent nonprofit organizations that serve local…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.
See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…
To operate a private school for pre-kindergarten through grade 12 in Wilmington, NC
Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
The mission of engaging creative minds is to inspire the creative and innovative potential of all students to achieve academically and become imaginative, adaptable, and productive adults resulting in stronger communities and an…
To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fulfillment Fund and the most unlike its peers is Willie Stargell Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISE WELLS CAMERON ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds Nourish International ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds LINC INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGADE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds GIRLS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY OF WILMINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Employment Services of Wilmingto Inc DBA StepUp Wilmington ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Willie Stargell Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern North Carolina Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Landfall Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · Cape Fear Memorial Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Dan Cameron Family Foundation Inc · The Eshelman Foundation · Directed Balloun Family Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · The Myrtle and Rt Sinclair Jr Charitable Foundation Inc · The True North Foundation Co Amy Brown North
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jeffrey Schrager & Anne York Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jeffrey Schrager & Anne York Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jeffrey Schrager & Anne York Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.