Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jeffrey Osborne Foundation

Support music and the arts for children and families, and safe-haven for families in need.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$120kArts & Culture$53kHousing & Shelter$38kEmployment$33kHuman Services$33kEducation$21kInternational$1k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$152k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Button Hole$10,000
RI Philharmonic$10,000
The Met School$10,000
Boys & Girls Club of Providence$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST MARY'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 14%ST MARY'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%ST MARY'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$275k · 7 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +107% since the first grant, against +81% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$275k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+81%

Still filing today

71%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +52%
  • BUTTON HOLE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +171%
  • RHODE ISLAND PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA & MUSIC SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Newport County Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +6%
  • HB
    HARTFORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY HOME FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Club of East Providence Inc

To inspire, enable, educate, and reach out to all young people in east providence, especially those who need us the most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

2
Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
3
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
4
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
5
Bethany Home of Ri Inc

The bethany home of rhode island provides continuous quality progressive rehabilitative services as well as skilled nursing and long term care in a community environment. this non-profit organization exceeds expectations by focusing on…

Health
6
Boston Philharmonic Orchestra Corporation

The BPO was formed in 1979 to provide opportunities for an evolving community of amateur student and professional players to perform together present challenging classical repertoire & enhance the publics awareness & understanding of this…

Arts & Culture
7
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah

Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Education
8
Berkeley Retirement Home Inc

None

9
Boys and Girls Club of Webster-Dudley Inc

The organization's mission is to provide a variety of recreational, educational and cultural activities for the youth in the webster-dudley massachusetts area.

Youth Development
10
Halom House Inc

Halom house, inc. is a private, non-profit residential agency supporting adults with developmental disabilities in the southern ohio area. halom house, inc. is dedicated to upholding the rights and responsibilities of every client served;…

11
Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley

To provide general, after school and day care, recreational, educational and social services for youths 2 through 18.

Youth Development
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Garden Grove Inc

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of garden grove, inc. is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Providence and the most unlike its peers is Manasota Asalh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

METROPOLITAN REGIONAL CAREER & TECH CENTER — $32,500 · OtherMETROPOLITAN REGIONAL CAREER & TEC…AMOS HOUSE — $32,500 · OtherAMOS HOUSEMetropolitan Regional Career & Technical Center — $20,000 · OtherMetropolitan Regional Career & Tec…HARTFORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $5,000 · OtherHARTFORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUBBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE — $52,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF…Boys and Girls Clubs of Newport County Inc — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Clubs of…BUTTON HOLE — $52,500 · Recreation & SportsBUTTON HOLERHODE ISLAND PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA & MUSIC SCHOOL — $52,500 · Arts & CultureRHODE ISLAND PHILHAR…ST MARY'S HOME FOR CHILDREN — $32,500 · Human ServicesST MARY'S HO…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesHOLY FAMILY HOME FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBest Buddies International Inc — $1,000 · International
Other$90,000Youth Development$62,500Recreation & Sports$52,500Arts & Culture$52,500Human Services$33,500Housing & Shelter$5,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE — $52,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBUTTON HOLE — $52,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetRHODE ISLAND PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA & MUSIC SCHOOL — $52,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMOS HOUSE — $32,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST MARY'S HOME FOR CHILDREN — $32,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Newport County Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLY FAMILY HOME FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMANASOTA ASALH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rhode Island Community FoundationRI21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · The Beacon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jeffrey Osborne Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jeffrey Osborne Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jeffrey Osborne Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph