Skip to content

· Public charity

Jeffersonville Urban Enterprise Association Inc

To encourage redevelopment in the urban portions of jeffersonville, indiana (the state-designated enterprise zone) in order to expand job opportunities and enhance residential property

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$711kRecreation & Sports$519kHousing & Shelter$132kArts & Culture$97kEducation$62kEnvironment$44kEmployment$20kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $127,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $154,375 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,375 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$851k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET$54,500
CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE$35,000
HYPERION VENTURES LLC$10,000
CLAYSBURG REUNION COMMITTEE$7,500
YMCA JEFFERSONVILLE$5,000
HANOVER COLLEGE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$5,000
CLAYSBURG NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NEW ROOTS INC: $10k → 15%YMCA JEFFERSONVILLE: $5k → 10%YMCA JEFFERSONVILLE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -23% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
23

Total granted

$1.4M
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-23%
-31%

Still filing today

43%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    JEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $710k · revenue +41% · 38% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $535k
  • MC
    MAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $57k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY HSM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -31%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +6%
  • AC
    ARC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $44k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Groundwork Indy Inc

GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…

Community Improvement
2
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
3
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing Inc

Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.

—
4
Chamber of Commerce of Harrison County

Support our members and the business environment by fostering economic and community development initiatives to improve the quality of life in harrison county.

—
5
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
6
Columbus Housing Initiative Inc

Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing

Housing & Shelter
7
Madisonville Community Urban Redevelopment Corporation

Advancing Madisonville through inclusive comprehensive community development

Philanthropy
8
Hamilton Heights Neighborhood Organization Inc

To promote neighborhood revitalization and sustainability in the Hamilton Heights, Wells-Goodfellow and surrounding neighborhoods by assisting others, increasing the quality and availability of affordable and market-rate housing, and…

—
9
Greene County Habitat for Humanity

Building and rehabilitation of houses for low income families

—
10
Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

—
11
Hancock County Habitat for Humanity

Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
12
Community Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc

To create an equitable and just community through high quality affordable housing and transformative resident services. We envision a community where an affordable home is available to everyone.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action of Southern Indiana; the most unlike its peers is Hanover College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE: $534,911 · OtherCITY OF JEFFERSONVILLEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INC: $50,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INCARC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC: $44,331 · OtherCLAYSBURG REUNION COMMITTEE: $39,266 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $36,160 · Other+21 more: $199,680 · Other+21 moreJEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INC: $710,217 · Community ImprovementJEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INCMAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $56,612 · EducationHanover College: $5,000 · EducationCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY HSM INC: $50,000 · Arts & Culturethe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEW ROOTS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLouisville Grows Incorporated: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$904,348Community Improvement$710,217Education$61,612Arts & Culture$50,000Human Services$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INC: $710,217 over 9y, 38% of budgetMAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $56,612 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY HSM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetLouisville Grows Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHanover College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY HSM INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Louisville Grows Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds Hanover College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Southern Indiana IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Indiana Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeffersonville Urban Enterprise Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeffersonville Urban Enterprise Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeffersonville Urban Enterprise Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph