· Public charity
Jeffersonville Urban Enterprise Association Inc
To encourage redevelopment in the urban portions of jeffersonville, indiana (the state-designated enterprise zone) in order to expand job opportunities and enhance residential property
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of JEFFERSONVILLE URBAN ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $148,040 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $180,625 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,585 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET | $60,000 |
| CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE | $35,000 |
| CLAYSBURG REUNION COMMITTEE | $16,000 |
| MAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $10,220 |
| HYPERION VENTURES LLC | $10,000 |
| WESLEY UNITED | $6,820 |
| TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| YMCA JEFFERSONVILLE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -31% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JMJEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INC8× · 2017–2024 · $656k · revenue +41% · 38% of their budget
- COCITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE6× · 2017–2024 · $500k
- MCMAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO3× · 2022–2024 · $57k · revenue -31%
Funded once
- CCCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY HSM INCone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -31%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +6%
- ACARC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLCone grant, 2020 · $44k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.
Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing
Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.
Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.
Building and rehabilitation of houses for low income families
Advancing Madisonville through inclusive comprehensive community development
Capital roots, inc. is a not for profit organization that nourishes healthy communities by providing access to fresh food and green spaces for all. it is our beleif that organic gardening and urban revitilization activites promote self…
North Branch Works is a membership-supported nonprofit neighborhood organization that for more than three decades has promoted balanced, job-creating economic development along the North Branch of the Chicago River.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…
Promote development in Perry County, Indiana
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action of Southern Indiana and the most unlike its peers is Maple Community Development Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEFFERSONVILLE MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds MAPLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY HSM INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Louisville Grows Incorporated ↗
- Who funds NEW ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA ↗
- Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Indiana Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jeffersonville Urban Enterprise Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.