Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jefferson Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$351kHealth$309kScience & Tech$247kHuman Services$219kArts & Culture$189kEnvironment$136kFood & Nutrition$104kInternational$87kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $164k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$26,000
MILLBROOK SCHOOL$26,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$15,000
FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE$15,000
ART COUNCIL OF MARTIN COUNTY$12,000
SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION$10,000
FOUNDING FRIENDS OF HOSPICE$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN$10,000
MARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$10,000
HARBOUR RIDGE FAMILY FOUNDATION$10,000
SAFESPACE$10,000
HECKSCHER MUSEUM$6,000
ASSOCIATION OF NAVAL AVIATION$5,000
THE GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $6k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 17%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%SAFESPACE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CT
CA
NE
VA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 50 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+50%

Still filing today

48%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesScience & TechFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +9%
  • MS
    MILLBROOK SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $151k · revenue +46%
  • SI
    SAFESPACE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AF
    ANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k
  • SC
    SEA CLIFF AMBULANCE FUND
    6× · 2017–2022 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SEA CLIFF VILLAGE LIBRARY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
4
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
5
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
6
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
7
Aquidneck Island Land Trust

To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.

Environment
8
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
9
Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

10
Lyme Land Conservation Trust Inc

Conservation of lyme's natural, scenic and historic land & water resources.

Environment
11
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
12
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Senior LivingFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%4%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,728

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NASSAU SUFFOLK SERVICES — $125,000 · OtherNASSAU SUFFOLK SERVICESVILLAGE OF SEA CLIFF FBO — $90,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF SEA CLIFF FBOSAVE THE CHILDREN — $87,000 · OtherSAVE THE CHILDRENFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE — $68,000 · OtherFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTETHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND — $66,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLANDMARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherMARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATIONVISIONARY SCHOOL OF ARTS — $44,000 · OtherFLUTTERBY FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC — $74,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC+31 more — $465,702 · Other+31 moreMILLBROOK SCHOOL — $151,000 · EducationMILLBROOK SCHOO…The Trustees of Princeton University — $41,000 · EducationThe Trustees of…KENT SCHOOL — $40,000 · EducationKENT SCHOOLGREEN VALE SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationGREEN VALE SCHO…SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $167,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRI…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $120,000 · HealthHECKSCHER MUSEUM — $48,000 · Arts & CultureMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES — $18,000 · Arts & CultureLONG ISLAND MARITIME MUSEUM — $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF FLY FISHING INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureSAFESPACE INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesCAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC — $34,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION — $12,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT LAND TRUST INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentSeatuck Environmental Association Inc — $5,000 · EnvironmentLoon Preservation Committee — $4,500 · EnvironmentCOALITION TO SAVE HEMPSTEAD HARBOR INC — $3,800 · Environment
Other$1,117,202Education$272,000Science & Tech$167,000Health$120,000Arts & Culture$105,000Human Services$94,000Environment$84,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $167,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMILLBROOK SCHOOL — $151,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFESPACE INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC — $74,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND — $66,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHECKSCHER MUSEUM — $48,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $41,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKENT SCHOOL — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC — $34,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetGREEN VALE SCHOOL — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHarbour Ridge Family Foundation — $27,500 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $25,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES — $18,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION — $12,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetASSOCIATION OF NAVAL AVIATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND MARITIME MUSEUM — $8,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF FLY FISHING INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSeatuck Environmental Association Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoon Preservation Committee — $4,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION TO SAVE HEMPSTEAD HARBOR INC — $3,800 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
  • Who funds MILLBROOK SCHOOL
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds SAFESPACE INC
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND
  • Who funds HECKSCHER MUSEUM
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds KENT SCHOOL
  • Who funds CAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREEN VALE SCHOOL
  • Who funds Harbour Ridge Family Foundation
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Stebbins Fund IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Stebbins Fund Inc · Cunniff Family Fund · Ann Eden Woodward Foundation · Robert David Lion Gardiner Foundation Inc · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jefferson Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 25%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc42% of income from government
  • Safespace Inc25% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph