Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeannine J Barrett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

76% of Jeannine J Barrett Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Jeannine J Barrett Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $35k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
3
’18
6
’19
3
’20
3
’21
6
’22
7
’23
6
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$109kHealth$67kPhilanthropy$60kHuman Services$55kReligion$27kRecreation & Sports$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$671k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$10,000
HEROES FOR CHILDREN$5,000
KENRICK GLENNON SEMINARY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE HEALING CHAIR$3,000
ME SQUARED CANCER FDN$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BE THE MATCH$1,000
STRAY RESCUE OF ST LOUIS$1,000
OUR LITTLE HAVEN$1,000
SPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $750 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
CA
MO
VA
SC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 23 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
23

Total granted

$268k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+67%

Still filing today

35%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HEROES FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +24%
  • TH
    The Healing Chair Inc
    4× · 2019–2023 · $18k · revenue +3% · 32% of their budget
  • TB
    THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS
    2× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +67%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • BT
    BE THE WATCH NATIONAL BONE MARROW
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
2
St Marys Foundation for Children Inc

St. Marys Foundation for Children, Inc. is dedicated to the enhancement of health, safety and quality of life for children with special needs.

—
3
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
4
Smh Case Management Inc

SMH Case Management, Inc. helps patients and families navigate the challenges of caring for a loved one at home by assisting families in accessing a full range of resources and programs within the community. Skilled case managers…

Health
5
Children's Miracle Network of Greater St

Impacting the lives of hospitalized children and their families by raising funds and awareness equally benefiting our member hospitals, st. louis children's hospital and ssm health cardinal glennon children's hospital. funds are used for…

Health
6
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
7
St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd

St. Luke's Health Foundation is a not-for-profit organization established to develop philanthropic resources that support St. Luke's mission "To improve the health of people in the communities we serve." We're responsible for cultivating…

Health
8
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
9
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
10
St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

Crime & Legal
11
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
12
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heroes for Children; the most unlike its peers is The Healing Chair Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Barat Academy: $40,250 · OtherBarat AcademyDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION: $31,190 · OtherDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATIONHEROES FOR CHILDREN: $29,000 · OtherHEROES FOR CHILDRENDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $21,500 · OtherDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $18,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOSEPH'S ACADEMY: $16,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S ACADEMYSLU: $14,500 · Other+34 more: $93,750 · Other+34 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $60,250 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHAR…NMDP FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyThe Healing Chair Inc: $17,500 · HealthMe Squared Cancer Foundation: $7,650 · HealthCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $1,000 · HealthCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsStray Rescue of St Louis: $3,000 · AnimalsWildlife Rescue Center: $1,000 · AnimalsCaritas Connections Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionST MARTHA'S HALL: $750 · Human Services
Other$280,190Philanthropy$63,250Health$26,150Recreation & Sports$15,000Animals$4,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Human Services$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $60,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBarat Academy: $40,250 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHEROES FOR CHILDREN: $29,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetThe Healing Chair Inc: $17,500 over 4y, 32% of budgetCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMe Squared Cancer Foundation: $7,650 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStray Rescue of St Louis: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWildlife Rescue Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARTHA'S HALL: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Barat Academy ↗
  • Who funds HEROES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds The Healing Chair Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Me Squared Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Stray Rescue of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Caritas Connections Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Rescue Center ↗
  • Who funds Cure Sanfilippo Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gene and Joan Slay Charitable Foundation · Boniface Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · United Way Worldwide · Edward Jones Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeannine J Barrett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeannine J Barrett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeannine J Barrett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph