Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$40kEducation$37kArts & Culture$20kRecreation & Sports$14kCivil Rights$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kFood & Nutrition$8kCrime & Legal$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
7
States reached
$447k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC$2,000
THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG CAMP$2,000
LAKE FOREST COLLEGE$2,000
WESTERN CONNECTICUT HEALTH NETWORK$1,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,500
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE$1,250
MINOR MEMORIAL LIBRARY$1,000
RIDGEFIELD VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION$1,000
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT HANDGUN VIOLENCE$1,000
WOMEN'S CENTER OF GREATER DANBURY$750
ROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$750
ROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION$750
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$500
ASAP (AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM)$500
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $2k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $2k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $750 → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $750 → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$154k · 24 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$154k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+45%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lake Forest College
    7× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +73%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +79%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FILM INSTITUE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TR
    THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Danbury Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Newport Hospital Foundation

NHF supports, encourages and coordinates the development of comprehensive, integrated health care-related services for the advancement and well-being of the community, in furtherance of the purposes of Newport Hospital (see Schedule O)

Health
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Western Connecticut Health Network Affiliates Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
6
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
7
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
8
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
9
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
10
The Hospital of Central Connecticut

The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
12
Windham Hospital Foundation Inc

The mission of the Windham Hospital Foundation Inc., is to build a bridge between the community and the hospital and to enhance the resources that support the Hospital in meeting the health care needs of our community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hunt Hill Farm Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT HANDGUN VIOLENCE: $7,000 · OtherBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT HANDGUN VIOLENCERVNAHEALTH INC: $7,000 · OtherRVNAHEALTH INCMINOR MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $6,500 · OtherMINOR MEMORIAL LIBRARYNEW MILFORD FOOD BANK: $5,500 · OtherNEW MILFORD FOOD BANKNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC: $5,000 · OtherNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INCThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $3,750 · OtherThe Center For Empowerment And Education In…ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT: $3,500 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUTAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3,500 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYNEW MILFORD VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · OtherROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $2,250 · OtherREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 · OtherREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN C…ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $3,500 · OtherANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTEROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,250 · Other+2 more: $3,500 · Other+2 moreLake Forest College: $16,500 · EducationLake Forest CollegeTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CON…THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $8,750 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN…AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $4,750 · Arts & CultureAFTER SCHOOL…DERBY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 · Arts & CultureDERBY HISTOR…THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RIDGEFIE…Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc: $13,300 · HealthDanbury Hosp…American Diabetes Association: $3,500 · HealthAmerican Dia…HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN T…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,500 · Crime & LegalROXBURY LAND TRUST INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentHUNT HILL FARM TRUST: $2,000 · Environment
Other$61,250Education$30,500Arts & Culture$17,500Health$16,800Recreation & Sports$13,500Crime & Legal$11,500Environment$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLake Forest College: $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc: $13,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $8,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROXBURY LAND TRUST INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $4,750 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDERBY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHUNT HILL FARM TRUST: $2,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWestern Connecticut Health Network Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds RVNAHEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ROXBURY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds DERBY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds HUNT HILL FARM TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Western Connecticut Health Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Persbacker Foundation IncCT26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Persbacker Foundation Inc · The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Patrick Foundation · Grace Jones Richardson Testamentary Trust C/O Piedmont Trust Co · Kermit and Patricia Adler Foundation Inc · Norwitt Family Charitable Foundation · The Robert & Mary Lou Morgado Charitable Trust · Taylor-Zemo Foundation Inc · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc: 2% of income from government
  • After School Arts Program Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark’s filings →

More from the funding graph