Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jean B Weiner Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$45kPhilanthropy$28kEducation$12kReligion$10kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH-EL$1,270
TIERRA MADRE HORSE AND HUMAN SANCTUARY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CONNECTICUT VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$68k · 8 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +274% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$68k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+274%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LV
    LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK
    4× · 2017–2020 · $44k · revenue +601%
  • AA
    ALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +67%
  • TP
    THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +274%

Funded once

  • EW
    EDWARD WEINER & EDWARD YAROCK EQUINE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -43%
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
2
Hillel Jewish University Center

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
6
Jewish Community Center On the Palisades

Deeply rooted in jewish values and tradition, the kaplen jcc on the palisades is a vibrant home for the jewish people that welcomes all and cultivates the social, intellectual, physical and spiritual well-being of the entire community.

7
The Center for Jewish History Inc

To protect and preserve the history of the jewish people; make available information and foster research; and to educate diverse constituencies through public programs and exhibitions.(continued on schedule o) opened in 2000, the center is…

Arts & Culture
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Arts Collaborative Inc

To explore and present the rich, diverse, and creative world of jewish arts and culture-past, present, and future-to the widest possible audience, in venues across greater boston. through a broad range of programming spanning the…

10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Federation of Western Massachusetts Inc

To ensure the continuity and well being of the jewish community in western ma, israel and the world by teaching the values of torah (jewish learning), klal yisrael (responsibility of each other), tikkun olam (repairing the world) and…

Philanthropy
12
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Healing Through the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK — $44,000 · OtherLEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORKTEMPLE BETH EL — $9,875 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELFEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · Other+6 more — $7,500 · Other+6 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $23,850 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE…+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyEDWARD WEINER & EDWARD YAROCK EQUINE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $10,000 · EducationEDWARD WEI…ALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM — $6,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EnvironmentRANCHO TIERRA MADRA CORP — $500 · AnimalsCONNECTICUT VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $500 · Human ServicesHEALING THROUGH THE ARTS INC — $250 · Health
Other$66,375Philanthropy$24,350Education$10,000Arts & Culture$8,500Environment$1,000Animals$500Human Services$500Health$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK — $44,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $23,850 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEDWARD WEINER & EDWARD YAROCK EQUINE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ALLENTOWN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO TIERRA MADRA CORP — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING THROUGH THE ARTS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable TrustFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · The R B Sabn Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jean B Weiner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph