· Private foundation
Jdsm Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOHN THEISMAN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $6,750 |
| SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $4,000 |
| ISLAND HARVEST FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING HOSPITAL | $1,000 |
| BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM | $1,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| EQUINE ADVOCATES | $1,000 |
| FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,000 |
| FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,000 |
| BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM | $1,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $1,000 |
| ISLAND HARVEST | $1,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $900 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TJTHE JOHN THEISSEN CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +24%
- IHISLAND HARVEST LTD9× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +110%
- CCCAPTAIN COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC6× · 2018–2024 · $26k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- BDBALLER DREAM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +7%
- TRTEAM RUBICON INCone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -7%
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry…
The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equine Advocates Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JOHN THEISSEN CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds CAPTAIN COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Belmont Child Care Association Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA WARHORSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUZERNE MUSIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Thoroughbred Charities of America Inc · The Riggio Foundation · The Mitzen Foundation Inc · Tracy Farmer Foundation Inc · Alfred Z Solomon Testamentary Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jdsm Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.