Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jb Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$228k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$187k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$337kHousing & Shelter$179kEducation$69kRecreation & Sports$17kSocial Science$11kHealth$8kReligion$8kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $187k
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE-JB FUND$187,165
SANTA BARBARA SCHOLORSHIP FUND$15,000
LOTUSLAND$2,500
SANTA BARBARA SCHOOL OF SQUASH$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,500
WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA$2,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC-CA CENTRAL COAST$2,000
TRANSITION HOUSE$1,500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,500
SANSUM CLINIC$1,000
SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS$1,000
WABASH COLLEGE$1,000
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$1,000
AFRICAN WOMEN RISING$1,000
FIRST TEE - CENTRAL COAST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND HARVEST: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$512k · 10 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
31

Total granted

$512k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+49%

Still filing today

40%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHousing & ShelterEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MUNCIE MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $179k · revenue +115%
  • WC
    Wabash College
    2× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +87%
  • TF
    TRUTH FOR LIFE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $800 · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • B
    BSIC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • VC
    VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FF
    FRAZIER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
2
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
3
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA

In response to God's love, grace, and truth, the purpose (mission) of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA is to establish and advance at colleges and universities witnessing communities of students and faculty who follow Jesus as Savior…

Religion
7
Indiana Wesleyan University

Indiana wesleyan university is a christ-centered academic community committed to changing the world by developing students in character, scholarship, and leadership.

Education
8
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
9
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
10
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
11
Lou Engle Ministries

Advancing the kingdom of god through prayer,preaching and teaching.

Religion
12
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Doors International Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE-JB FUND: $307,165 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE-JB FUNDBSIC: $20,000 · OtherOIKODOMEO FOUNDATION: $17,000 · Other+55 more: $115,748 · Other+55 moreMUNCIE MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $178,500 · Housing & ShelterMUNCIE MISSION MINISTRIES INCWabash College: $2,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationTRUTH FOR LIFE: $800 · ReligionOPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $300 · ReligionTHE FELLOWSHIP INC: $200 · ReligionIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $200 · ReligionWORLD VISION INC: $945 · InternationalSecond Harvest: $500 · Human ServicesFIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC: $300 · HealthCare Net: $100 · Civil Rights
Other$459,913Housing & Shelter$178,500Education$4,000Religion$1,500International$945Human Services$500Health$300Civil Rights$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUNCIE MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $178,500 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetWabash College: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $945 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FELLOWSHIP INC: $200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCare Net: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUNCIE MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Wabash College ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jb Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jb Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jb Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph