Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jar Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$11kHealth$11kReligion$11kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$5kEnvironment$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$239k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,300
ACRES LAND TRUST$1,100
FWCS FOUNDATION$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,100
CONVOY OF HOPE$1,100
BELLE VIST PREGNANCY CENTERS$1,100
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$1,100
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FW$1,100
CARRIAGE HOUSE$1,100
MATTHEW 25$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $1k → 11%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $800 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49k · 14 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$49k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
-24%

Still filing today

57%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FWCS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +570%
  • AI
    ACRES Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +370%
  • M2
    MATTHEW 25 INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IT
    I THINK THEREFORE I AMCIVIC ASSOC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IT
    I THINK I AM
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
2
Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated

The central indiana land trust, inc. preserves the best of central indiana's natural areas, protecting plants and animals, so hoosiers can experience the wonder of the state's natural heritage.

Environment
3
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
4
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
5
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
6
International Center for the Preservation of Wild Animals Inc

The wilds is a conservation center and safari park operating as a not-for-profit 501(c)3 organization on nearly 10,000-acres in southeastern ohio. the wilds specializes in high-quality recreational opportunities that focus on connecting…

Animals
7
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
8
Tri-State Food Bank

Tri-state food bank, inc solicits, warehouses, and disburses donated and purchased food products to other not-for-profit entities in indiana, illinois, and kentucky.

—
9
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
10
Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc

To foster and encourage private philanthropic giving, to enhance the spirit of community, and to improve the quality of life in the wayne county, indiana, area now and for future generations.

Philanthropy
11
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
12
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc; the most unlike its peers is Acres Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT WAYNE SOUTH BEND DIOCESE: $8,700 · OtherFORT WAYNE SOUTH BEND DIOCESECATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESFWCS FOUNDATION INC: $4,800 · OtherFWCS FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBELLE VIST PREGNANCY CENTERS: $3,200 · OtherBELLE VIST PREGNANCY CENTERSCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $3,100 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESI THINK THEREFORE I AMCIVIC ASSOC: $2,500 · OtherI THINK THEREFORE I AMCIVIC ASSOCALLEN CO PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,100 · OtherI THINK I AM: $2,000 · OtherCOMM FOUNDATION OF GREATER FW: $1,800 · OtherONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $1,800 · Other+4 more: $3,200 · Other+4 moreMATTHEW 25 INC: $3,700 · HealthMATTHEW 25 I…FORT WAYNE CLUBHOUSE INC: $2,200 · HealthFORT WAYNE C…BELLA VITA NETWORK: $1,600 · HealthBELLA VITA N…ACRES Inc: $4,800 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,600 · AnimalsBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $2,200 · Youth DevelopmentCONVOY OF HOPE: $2,200 · International
Other$46,000Health$7,500Environment$4,800Philanthropy$3,000Animals$2,600Youth Development$2,200International$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFWCS FOUNDATION INC: $4,800 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetACRES Inc: $4,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMATTHEW 25 INC: $3,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFORT WAYNE CLUBHOUSE INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLA VITA NETWORK: $1,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FWCS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACRES Inc ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE SIMPLE WISH INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLA VITA NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer TrusteeIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer Trustee · M E Raker Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Surack Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jar Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jar Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jar Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jar Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph