Skip to content

· Public charity

Japanese American Citizens League

The JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE is a national organization whose ongoing mission is to secure and maintain the civil rights of japanese americans and all others who are victimized by injustice and bigotry.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$163kCivil Rights$102kPublic Benefit$33kEducation$15kYouth Development$14kScience & Tech$10kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$6k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $21,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $131,714 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $110,664 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,650
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACL-SAN JOSE CHAPTER$8,000
JACL-TWIN CITIES CHAPTER$7,650
JACL-WISCONSIN CHAPTER$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 32% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JACL - BOISE VALLEY CHAPTER: $8k → 11%JACL - TWIN CITIES CHAPTER: $8k → 11%JACL - PHILADELPHIA CHAPTER: $8k → 7%JACL-SAN JOSE CHAPTER: $8k → 8%JACL-VENTURA COUNTY CHAPTER: $6k → 10%JACL-EDEN TOWNSHIP CHAPTER: $6k → 10%JACL - SAN DIEGO CHAPTER: $8k → 11%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $28k → 14%JACL - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 19%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10k → 14%JACL-WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $5k → 17%JACL - PACIFIC NORTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 8%JACL - INTERMOUNTAIN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 6%JACL-MILE HIGH CHAPTER: $6k → 12%DENSHO: $122k → 9%JACL-WASHINGTON DC CHAPTER: $6k → 8%JACL - EASTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 7%JACL-PSW REGIONAL OFFICE: $5k → 14%JACL - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 19%JACL - INTERMOUNTAIN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 6%JACL-PUYALLUP VALLEY CHAPTER: $6k → 9%JACL - EASTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 7%JACL CENTRAL CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 19%JACL INTERMOUNTAIN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 6%JACL - PACIFIC NORTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL: $8k → 9%JACL EASTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 7%JACL - INTERMOUNTAIN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 6%JACL - PACIFIC NORTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 9%JACL - EASTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 7%JACL PACIFIC NORTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL: $6k → 9%JACL-SEATTLE CHAPTER: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
WI
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Japanese American Citizens League’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Japanese American Citizens Leaguelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 5 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

$97k
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
-12%

Still filing today

20%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k
  • JA
    JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $24k
  • JA
    JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $17k

Funded once

  • D
    DENSHO
    one grant, 2023 · $122k · revenue -34%
  • JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue -12%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
2
Alliance for Perserving the Truth of Sino-Japan War

Public education

Arts & Culture
3
Japanese American Citizens League

The JACL Sacramento Chapter is dedicated to securing and maintaining the civil rights of Japanese Americans JA and all others who are victimized by injustice and bigotry. We are committed to promoting cultural preservation community…

Community Improvement
4
Japanese American Citizens League Silicon Valley Chapter

The Japanese American Citizens League is a national organization whose ongoing mission is to secure and maintain the civil rights of Japanese Americans and all others who are victimized by injustice and bigotry. The leaders and members of…

—
5
Java Historical Society
Arts & Culture
6
Japanese American Citizens League Sonoma County Chapter

Sonoma County Chapter of the Jaapanese American Citizens League is committed to the protection and advancement of civil rights and community development for Japanese Americans and all others who are victimized by injustice and bigotry.

Arts & Culture
7
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
8
Portland Japanese American Citizens League

The mission of the Portland chapter of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) is to celebrate our Japanese American culture and use lessons from our unique American experience to promote and protect human and civil rights for all.

Education
9
Us-Japan Research Institute Suite 801
—
10
Tessaku

To provide historical and educational content about the Japanese American WWII incarceration as a public service and resource

Arts & Culture
11
Japanese American Citizens League of Houston

To foster american democracy,promote active participation in civic and national life, provide an environment conducive to the development of the individual, encourage the preservation of japanese american heritage, secure justice and equal…

—
12
Japan America Society of Minnesota

JASM provides a place where both individuals and businesses are able to engage in cultural activities, meet others with an interest in Japan, form new business relationships, learn, and build mutual respect between Japan and America. Our…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Chapter Japanese American Citizens League Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $24,750 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUEJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $24,000 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUEJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $16,500 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUEJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $16,500 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUETWIN CITIES CHAPTER JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEA: $15,150 · OtherTWIN CITIES CHAPTER JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEASAN DIEGO CHAPTER JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE INC: $7,500 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $7,500 · OtherOregon Nisei Veterans co Claude Larouche: $6,250 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $6,000 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $6,000 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE - PUYALLUP VALLEY: $6,000 · OtherJapanese American Citizens League Seattle Chapter: $6,000 · OtherJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $6,000 · Other+5 more: $27,449 · Other+5 moreDENSHO: $122,200 · Arts & CultureDENSHOJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $28,095 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUMSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONJapanese American Citizens League San Jose Chapter: $8,000 · Community ImprovementJAPANESE AMER CITIZENS LEAGUE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL: $5,103 · Community Improvement
Other$175,599Arts & Culture$160,295Community Improvement$13,103

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENSHO: $122,200 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $28,095 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTWIN CITIES CHAPTER JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEA: $15,150 over 2y, 19% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJapanese American Citizens League San Jose Chapter: $8,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO CHAPTER JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetOregon Nisei Veterans co Claude Larouche: $6,250 over 1y, 15% of budgetJapanese American Citizens League Seattle Chapter: $6,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetJAPANESE AMER CITIZENS LEAGUE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL: $5,103 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Japanese American Citizens League funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Japanese American Citizens League. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Japanese American Citizens League’s filings →

    More from the funding graph