Skip to content
Jane & Arthur Stangel Fund Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jane & Arthur Stangel Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$245kEducation$203kHousing & Shelter$144kArts & Culture$143kFood & Nutrition$109kHealth$60kReligion$35kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$998k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Felician Service$15,000
Ascend Services$15,000
The Crossings of Manitowoc County$10,000
Grow It Forward$10,000
The Salvation Army$10,000
Incourage (Domestic Violence Center)$10,000
Hope House of Manitowoc County$10,000
The Haven of Manitowoc County$10,000
Capitol Civic Centre$5,000
Peter's Pantry$5,000
Feeding American - Eastern WI$5,000
Roncalli Catholic Schools$5,000
Manitowoc Public Library Foundation$5,000
Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA$5,000
KAN Cool for School$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Hope House of Manitowoc County: $10k → 11%Hope House of Manitowoc County: $10k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $8k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $7k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Manitowoc-Two Rivers YMCA: $5k → 11%Shady Lane Inc: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$921k · 36 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
18

Total granted

$921k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +99%
  • CC
    CAPITOL CIVIC CENTRE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +43%
  • PP
    PETERS PANTRY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +323%
  • FS
    Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TH
    The Hope House of Manitowoc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manitowoc County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need

—
2
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
3
Harwood Place Inc

Harwood place, inc. is dedicated to serving older adults and enriching the lives of those we touch by providing compassionate and loving care.

Housing & Shelter
4
Progress Lakeshore Inc

To assist local businesses in their growth in the manitowoc county area and to attract new businesses to the manitowoc county area.

Community Improvement
5
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
6
Lutheran Counseling and Family Services

Lutheran counseling and family services of wisconsin provides faith-based mental health counseling, family life education and adoption services.

Human Services
7
Lakeshore Community Services Inc

The mission of lakeshore is to enhance the ability of persons with mental and physical disabilities to live as independently as possible through acquisition of skills and utilization of services that promote each individual's self…

Human Services
8
The Chamber of Manitowoc County Inc

The chamber of manitowoc is a member-driven organization that provides resources and services to promote and maintain a strong business environment.

—
9
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
10
Waukesha County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin

Environment
11
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
12
Core Treatment Services Inc

We believe in the hope and promise for people who want something better than the destruction of substance use disorder. we will help people find the residential and day treatment options, emotional tools, social connectedness, and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the Fox Cities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Holy Family Memorial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Salvation Army: $81,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyThe Crossings of Manitowoc County: $70,000 · OtherThe Crossings of Manitowoc CountyIncourage (Domestic Violence Center): $61,000 · OtherIncourage (Domestic Violence Center)Roncalli High School: $60,000 · OtherRoncalli High SchoolCAPITOL CIVIC CENTRE INC: $55,000 · OtherCAPITOL CIVIC CENTRE INCSILVER LAKE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY FAMILY INC: $52,096 · OtherSILVER LAKE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY FAMILY INCMANITOWOC PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherMANITOWOC PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIONHope House: $40,000 · OtherHope HouseMake-A-Wish Foundation: $34,000 · OtherFelician Service: $25,000 · OtherFeeding American - Eastern WI: $23,500 · Other+30 more: $121,075 · Other+30 morePETERS PANTRY INC: $53,000 · Food & NutritionPETERS PA…GROW IT FORWARD INC: $32,000 · Food & NutritionGROW IT F…THE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterManitowoc-Two Rivers Area YMCA (7101): $49,500 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesASCEND SERVICES INC: $47,900 · HealthHOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INC: $2,000 · HealthLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $2,000 · HealthManitowoc Professional Police Association: $8,000 · EducationLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $4,200 · EducationTREEHOUSE THEATER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMASQUERS INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMANITOWOC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$667,671Food & Nutrition$85,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Human Services$73,500Health$51,900Education$12,200Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $75,000 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetCAPITOL CIVIC CENTRE INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPETERS PANTRY INC: $53,000 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetSILVER LAKE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY FAMILY INC: $52,096 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetManitowoc-Two Rivers Area YMCA (7101): $49,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetASCEND SERVICES INC: $47,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMANITOWOC PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetGROW IT FORWARD INC: $32,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetManitowoc Professional Police Association: $8,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetCASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE THEATER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $4,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOU COUNCIL INC D/B/A GIRL SCOUTS OF MANITOU COUNCIL: $3,825 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMASQUERS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND DUNES NATURE CENTER AND PRESERVE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHADY LANE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOWOC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITOL CIVIC CENTRE INC ↗
  • Who funds PETERS PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SILVER LAKE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds Manitowoc-Two Rivers Area YMCA (7101) ↗
  • Who funds ASCEND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MANITOWOC PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GROW IT FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Manitowoc Professional Police Association ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FELICIAN VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MANITOU COUNCIL INC D/B/A GIRL SCOUTS OF MANITOU COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MASQUERS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAND DUNES NATURE CENTER AND PRESERVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ruth St John & John D…Lakeshore Community F…Green Bay Packers Fou…Wisconsin Public Serv…Harold C Kallies Char…Frank G & Frieda K Br…Nash Family FoundationKohler Foundation IncCommunity Foundation …Greater Green Bay Com…Neshotah Charitable F…Donald J and Brenda J…
Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation IncWI49.4× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Harold C Kallies Charitable Trust 32f003019 · Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Nash Family Foundation · Kohler Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Neshotah Charitable Foundation Inc · Donald J and Brenda J Debruyn Charitable Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane & Arthur Stangel Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane & Arthur Stangel Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane & Arthur Stangel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home