Skip to content
Jandt Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jandt Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$273kEducation$127kRecreation & Sports$48kHousing & Shelter$9kInternational$3kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE 13TH MAN$11,000
HILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY SCHOOL$9,360
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$2,500
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$1,250
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$1,000
FOOD FOR OTHERS$1,000
LOW COUNTY WOUNDED WARRIORS CHARITY$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%THE 13TH MAN: $155k → 11%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $700 → 6%THE 13TH MAN: $70k → 11%THE 13TH MAN: $30k → 11%THE 13TH MAN: $11k → 11%NOTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 6%THE 13TH MAN: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$447k · 10 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$447k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-13%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +54%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +16%
  • FH
    Flint Hill School
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • I
    IDRF
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • NS
    N STREET VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
3
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
4
Northeastern University
Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is N Street Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE 13TH MAN INC: $267,500 · Human ServicesTHE 13TH MAN INC+2 more: $2,200 · Human ServicesTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $75,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $26,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYHILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $9,360 · EducationHILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADE…Flint Hill School: $4,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS: $48,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVER…JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $6,250 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIV…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $5,500 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMEN…WHARTON SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherWHARTON SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIDRF: $2,500 · Other+4 more: $3,500 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 · Health
Human Services$269,700Education$114,860Other$73,750Housing & Shelter$7,500Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE 13TH MAN INC: $267,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $26,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $9,360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFlint Hill School: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jandt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jandt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jandt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home