Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jandt Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$273kEducation$127kRecreation & Sports$48kHousing & Shelter$9kInternational$3kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE 13TH MAN$11,000
HILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY SCHOOL$9,360
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$2,500
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$1,250
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$1,000
LOW COUNTY WOUNDED WARRIORS CHARITY$1,000
FOOD FOR OTHERS$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%THE 13TH MAN: $155k → 11%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $700 → 6%THE 13TH MAN: $70k → 11%THE 13TH MAN: $30k → 11%THE 13TH MAN: $11k → 11%NOTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 6%THE 13TH MAN: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$447k · 10 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$447k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-13%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +54%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +16%
  • FH
    Flint Hill School
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • I
    IDRF
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • NS
    N STREET VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
3
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
4
Northeastern University
Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is N Street Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE 13TH MAN INC — $267,500 · Human ServicesTHE 13TH MAN INC+2 more — $2,200 · Human ServicesTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $75,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $26,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYHILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $9,360 · EducationHILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADE…Flint Hill School — $4,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS — $48,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVER…JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $6,250 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIV…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT — $5,500 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMEN…WHARTON SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherWHARTON SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIDRF — $2,500 · Other+4 more — $3,500 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $1,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $1,000 · Health
Human Services$269,700Education$114,860Other$73,750Housing & Shelter$7,500Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE 13TH MAN INC — $267,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $26,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $9,360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFlint Hill School — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC — $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jandt Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph