Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jams Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$316k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$496kHealth$231kReligion$205kInternational$60kFood & Nutrition$30kArts & Culture$20kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANITARIAN FUND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST$160,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$50,000
BYU SCHOLARSHIP FUND$50,000
PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA FUND$36,382
TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 2% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%HUMANITARIAN FUND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST: $160k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%FEEDING AMERICA: $20k → 14%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION: $10k → 6%TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 9%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $60k → 8%BYU SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $50k → 8%HUMANITARIAN FUND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST: $20k → 8%BYU: $20k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA: $365k → 8%BYU: $5k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA: $230k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $224k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA: $200k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $112k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA: $200k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA: $115k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA FUND: $36k → 8%NO POOR AMONG US: $25k → 8%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 8%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%UTAH SYMPHONY UTAH OPERA: $20k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA PROJECT: $90k → 8%PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA PROJECT: $69k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 6 repeat orgs$272k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+4%

Still filing today

17%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M
  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2025 · $386k
  • HF
    HUMANITARIAN FUND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST
    2× · 2023–2025 · $180k

Funded once

  • SL
    SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • NP
    NO POOR AMONG US
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • 9S
    988 SUICIDE AND CRISIS LINE NATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
2
Food Allergy Fund

The food allergy fund is dedicated to funding food allergy research focused on the underlying causes of food allergies and improved treatments for people with food allergies.

Health
3
Partnership for a Healthier America Inc

Advancing equitable access to nutritious food for all in America to lead healthy lives.

Youth Development
4
Bread for the World Institute

To provide analysis and education on hunger issues in the United States and around the world.

International
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
8
International Food Policy Research Institute

International food policy research institute's (ifpri) vision is a world free of hunger and malnutrition. ifpri's mission is to provide research-based policy solutions that sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition.

Food & Nutrition
9
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
10
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
11
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
12
Afe Foundation

We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treatment Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Utah Symphony & Opera. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $386,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYHUMANITARIAN FUND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST: $180,000 · OtherHUMANITARIAN FUND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTPACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA PROJECT: $159,000 · OtherPACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA PROJECT+6 more: $195,000 · Other+6 morePACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA FUND: $36,382 · HealthTREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 · HealthST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthMentors International: $35,000 · InternationalFeeding America: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,030,000Health$52,382International$35,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMentors International: $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACHYONYCHIA CONGENITA FUND ↗
  • Who funds Mentors International ↗
  • Who funds NO POOR AMONG US ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph