· Private foundation
James127
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $149k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $91,279 |
| CHURCH OF THE LIVING GOD | $57,500 |
| MISSION TO MYANMAR | $25,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- COCHURCH OF THE LIVING GOD5× · 2020–2024 · $220k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2024 · $184k
- MTMISSION TO MYANMAR5× · 2020–2024 · $91k
Funded once
- FOFOUNDATIONS OF GRACEone grant, 2022 · $35k
- FOFOUNDATIONS OF GRACE PUBLISHINGone grant, 2020 · $35k
- AFANOINTED FAITH MINISTRYone grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…
Safe Place supports survivors of sex trafficking and exploitation through relationships, empowerment, and opportunities.
Freed Life exists to eradicate human trafficking through empowering survivors, equipping communities and changing systems.
HOPE (Healing Opportunity Provided Equally) works to end violence and provide safety through direct services, education and advocacy to all people experiencing domestic violence
Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.
Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.
To provide emergency and long-term wrap-around therapeutic care to the minor survivors of sex trafficking and exploitation.
To improve lives by ending domestic violence.
Doors to Freedom has established to provide a safe place for survivors of sex trafficking to experience a transformed life. Our organization believes truth is essential for freedom and knowing truth and understanding truth gives meaning to…
Ministering to victims of sex-trafficking.
Alternatives to violence provides shelter, advocacy, education and resources for people impacted by domestic violence, sexual assault and n trafficking.
Tri-Valley Haven for Women provides emergency shelter and services for survivors and their children who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, homelessness, and poverty. Tri-Valley offers a variety of supplemental services…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization James127 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James127. Bigger dots raise more.
- Created Gainesville Inc: 9% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on James127’s filings →