Skip to content

· Private foundation

James W Thornton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$26kHuman Services$17kEducation$16kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$4kHealth$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
8
States reached
$148k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE$1,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$700
THE ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL$600
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$516
Individual grant recipient$500
WTTW 11$500
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$500
Individual grant recipient$309
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$300
SALISBURY SCHOOL$300
AMERICAN RED CROSS$300
EASTER SEALS$206
DUKE UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND$200
BGA ASSOCIATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHICAGO COMMONS: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
CT
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 28 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
7

Total granted

$84k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+108%

Still filing today

43%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +80%
  • EW
    ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • SS
    SALISBURY SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • WW
    WORLD WLDLIFE FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • N
    NPR
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • R
    REFUGEEONEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +332%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
8
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
11
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ethel Walker School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shawchicago Theater Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $14,900 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3,832 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOS: $3,800 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSWTTW 11: $3,700 · OtherWTTW 11Individual grant recipient: $3,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,869 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDENISON UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $2,500 · OtherBGA ASSOCIATION: $2,100 · OtherTHORNTON'S BOYS CLUB: $2,000 · OtherCHATHAM HALL ANNUAL FUND: $2,000 · OtherAURORA REGIONAL FIRE MUSEUM: $1,700 · Other+11 more: $6,747 · Other+11 moreMUSIC OF THE BAROQUE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC OF THE BAROQUETHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $1,300 · Arts & CultureTHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIE…ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC: $5,400 · EducationETHEL WALKER SCHOO…SALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $2,600 · EducationSALISBURY SCHOOL I…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $1,800 · EducationTHE NEWBERRY LIBRA…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE …FRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,550 · Food & NutritionWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,550 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $908 · Human ServicesChicago Commons Association: $200 · Human ServicesREFUGEEONE: $500 · Religion
Other$49,498Arts & Culture$16,300Education$13,800Recreation & Sports$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,550Environment$1,550Human Services$1,108Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSIC OF THE BAROQUE: $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC: $5,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $2,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $1,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $1,430 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $1,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $908 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHAWCHICAGO THEATER CO: $800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRANT KOCH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Commons Association: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE ↗
  • Who funds ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PARKS ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SHAWCHICAGO THEATER CO ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds THE GRANT KOCH SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Commons Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James W Thornton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James W Thornton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James W Thornton Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph