Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James E & John a Keyes Families Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of JAMES E & JOHN A KEYES FAMILIES FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$432k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST MARY VISITATION PARISH$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$5,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
CONGREGATION OF THE HOLY CROSS$1,000
NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY$1,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$1,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WI$1,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
REPAIRERS OF THE BREACH$1,000
WAUKESHA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$1,000
LOVE ONE ANOTHER CAMPAIGN - ARCHDIOCESE$1,000
CATHOLIC MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
OUR LADY OF NEW MELLERAY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $400 → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $400 → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $400 → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $200 → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $200 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$227k · 36 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
11

Total granted

$227k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+1%

Still filing today

22%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +13%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +4%
  • FM
    Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -19%
  • LO
    LOVE ONE ANOTHER CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
2
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
3
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
7
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
8
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
9
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
12
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of Madison and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC — $45,000 · OtherMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INCIndividual grant recipient — $30,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHN VIANNEY PARISH — $17,000 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY PARISHST MARY VISITATION PARISH — $15,000 · OtherST MARY VISITATION PARISHMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HS — $10,000 · OtherWAUKESHA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS — $9,100 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION — $9,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WI — $8,600 · OtherCONGREGATION OF THE HOLY CROSS — $8,000 · Other+30 more — $63,225 · Other+30 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $45,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $1,750 · Education+1 more — $1,225 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,600 · HealthREPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC — $4,250 · Housing & ShelterTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $1,600 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON — $1,000 · Human ServicesFroedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc — $1,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC — $750 · Food & NutritionTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $400 · Public Benefit
Other$215,675Education$49,975Health$5,600Housing & Shelter$4,250Human Services$2,600Philanthropy$1,500Food & Nutrition$750Public Benefit$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC — $4,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ELM GROVE LIBRARY — $1,225 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds REPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELM GROVE LIBRARY
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI20.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Zurn Foundation Inc (Fka Rexnord Foundation Inc) · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James E & John a Keyes Families Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James E & John a Keyes Families Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to James E & John a Keyes Families Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph