Skip to content

· Private foundation

James Christianman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

53% of James Christianman Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to El Paso Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year James Christianman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $51k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’18
4
’19
5
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$75kArts & Culture$75kReligion$44kHuman Services$30kEnvironment$22kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$880k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST CHILD OF DETROIT$10,000
THE CANDLELIGHTERS$9,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION$5,000
PALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN$5,000
GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE$5,000
WIDOWS HARVEST MINISTRIES$5,000
GOSPEL RESCUE MISSIONS$5,000
UNIVERSITY CITY CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NV
OH
CA
AZ
TN
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 9 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$234k
$5k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CANDLELIGHTERS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $100k
  • CC
    CHRIST CHILD OF DETROIT
    3× · 2019–2025 · $25k
  • CA
    CLEAN AIR CHRISTIAN RADIO
    3× · 2021–2025 · $22k

Funded once

  • CH
    CASA HOGAR MAXIMO COMEJO QUIROZ
    2× · 2018–2025 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
2
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
3
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
4
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
5
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
6
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
7
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
8
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
9
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
10
Orlando Union Rescue Mission Inc

To bring the hungry, hurting, and homeless to a new life, new goals, and a new future in christ.

Housing & Shelter
11
Covenant House Illinois Inc

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
12
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries; the most unlike its peers is El Paso Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CANDLELIGHTERS: $99,500 · OtherTHE CANDLELIGHTERSCHRIST CHILD OF DETROIT: $25,000 · OtherCHRIST CHILD OF DETROITCLEAN AIR CHRISTIAN RADIO: $22,000 · OtherCLEAN AIR CHRISTIAN RADIOIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $10,000 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSIONS: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $23,818 · Other+6 moreEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $170,344 · PhilanthropyEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INCPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesWidows Harvest Ministries Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$202,818Philanthropy$185,344Human Services$30,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $170,344 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWidows Harvest Ministries Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Widows Harvest Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James Christianman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James Christianman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James Christianman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James Christianman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James Christianman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph