Skip to content

· Private foundation

James C Acheson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$368k
Granted FY2023
23
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$77k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of James C Acheson Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of St Clair County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year James C Acheson Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $368k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
14
’18
13
’19
13
’20
14
’21
8
’22
7
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$978kArts & Culture$750kHuman Services$376kHealth$338kCommunity Improvement$305kYouth Development$287kReligion$125kRecreation & Sports$117kOther$0
02FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $205k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORT HURON POLICE DEPARTMENT$77,485
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR CO$77,123
PRESBYTARIAN VILLAGE OF MI FOUNDATI$50,000
PORT HURON MUSEUM$40,575
ATHLETIC FACTORY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$23,541
SONS$19,000
CITIZENS FOR A VIBRANT COMMUNITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
MID-CITY NUTRITION$6,000
BLUE WATER AREA CHAMBER$5,000
SAFE HORIZONS$5,000
OPERATION TRANSFORMATION$3,000
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - PH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,690
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SAFE HORIZONS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CT
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 44 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2023, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
30

Total granted

$2.9M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+55%

Still filing today

23%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SONS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $269k · revenue +357%
  • AF
    ATHLETIC FACTORY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $91k · revenue +379%
  • HH
    HUNTER HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $20k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • MB
    MCLAREN BIRTHPLACE
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • LP
    LINCOLN PARK IMPROVEMENTS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • BW
    BLUE WATER YOUNG PROFESSIONALS
    one grant, 2018 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Buffalo Charter School

South buffalo charter school provides elementary education to students in grades kindergarten through eighth grade. we are a professional learning community. our focus on learning is driven by research, data and collaborative reflection to…

Education
2
Economic Development Alliance of St Clair County

The economic development alliance of st. clair county creates economic prosperity by growing companies and cultivating vibrant communities, developing a workforce with 21st century skills, and marketing our regional advantages. we are…

—
3
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
4
The Community Renaissance Fund

To operate exclusively for, charitable, or other exempt purpose by acting for the benefit of performing functions of, or carrying out the charitable or other exempt purposes of the community foundation of st. clair county.

Community Improvement
5
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
6
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
7
Harbor Country Day School

Harbor cherishes childhood, cultivates wonder and inspires confident learners and leaders.

Education
8
Cape Henry Collegiate School Inc

We know, value, and challenge each student. we commit to building a diverse and inclusive community. we graduate independent thinkers and globally aware citizens.

Education
9
Fond Du Lac Christian School Inc

To serve the christian home and church by disciplining students academically and spiritually; helping each student attain a biblical worldview and their full potential as unique and beloved creations of a sovereign god.

Education
10
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
11
Annie Wright Schools

Annie wright's strong community cultivates individual learners to become well-educated, creative and responsible citizens for a global society.

—
12
Cedar Valley United Way

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of St Clair County; the most unlike its peers is Operation Transformation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PORT HURON MUSEUM: $309,145 · OtherPORT HURON MUSEUMCFSCC: $206,876 · OtherCFSCCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR C: $183,224 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR CPORT HURON HOSPITAL: $181,440 · OtherPORT HURON HOSPITALYMCA: $145,000 · OtherYMCAIndividual grant recipient: $120,964 · OtherMID-CITY NUTRITION: $114,900 · OtherPORT HURON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $110,000 · OtherPORT HURON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $107,274 · OtherMCLAREN FOUNDATION - CATH LAB: $100,000 · OtherPRESBYTARIAN VILLAGE OF MI FOUNDATI: $100,000 · Other+58 more: $671,508 · Other+58 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR COUNTY: $712,820 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropySONS: $269,450 · Youth DevelopmentSONSATHLETIC FACTORY INC: $90,686 · Youth DevelopmentATHLETIC F…+1 more: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDIO 1219 INC: $260,150 · Arts & CultureBLUE WATER COMMUNITY ACTION: $200,100 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS FOR A VIBRANT COMMUNITY: $23,500 · Community ImprovementHUNTER HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC: $19,690 · HealthOPERATION TRANSFORMATION: $18,500 · Religion
Other$2,350,331Philanthropy$722,820Youth Development$370,136Arts & Culture$260,150Community Improvement$223,600Health$19,690Religion$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR COUNTY: $712,820 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetSONS: $269,450 over 8y, 23% of budgetSTUDIO 1219 INC: $260,150 over 5y, 62% of budgetBLUE WATER COMMUNITY ACTION: $200,100 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetATHLETIC FACTORY INC: $90,686 over 5y, 15% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A VIBRANT COMMUNITY: $23,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetHUNTER HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC: $19,690 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetOPERATION TRANSFORMATION: $18,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetA BEAUTIFUL ME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetBLUE WATER LAND FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTHE FAY SCHOOL INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE WATER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Electrochemical Society Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST BERNARD'S SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HORIZONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ARC OF ST CLAIR COUNTY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGROSSE POINTE YACHT CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SONS ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO 1219 INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE WATER COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds ATHLETIC FACTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR A VIBRANT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds HUNTER HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds A BEAUTIFUL ME INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE WATER LAND FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Clair CountyMI28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Clair County · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way of St Clair County · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James C Acheson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James C Acheson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Electrochemical Society Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to James C Acheson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to James C Acheson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James C Acheson’s filings →

More from the funding graph