Skip to content

· Private foundation

James Benjamin and Agnes M Liles Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$627k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$55,000
WINGATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$15,000
WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY$7,500
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$7,500
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$7,500
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$7,500
COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$5,000
WOFFORD COLLEGE$5,000
STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA - LANCASTER: $8k → 11%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%WOFFORD COLLEGE: $8k → 15%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $55k → 16%COKER COLLEGE: $8k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $8k → 11%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 7%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHARLOTTE: $8k → 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%STANLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL: $15k → 13%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $8k → 18%SOUTH PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 22%NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE: $8k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $5k → 18%WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%WOFFORD COLLEGE: $5k → 15%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $53k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $8k → 11%WINGATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 7%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL: $15k → 13%WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $53k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $8k → 11%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL: $8k → 13%WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $45k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $8k → 11%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL: $8k → 13%WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$538k · 12 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$538k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+18%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +23%
  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +36%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • MT
    MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • WC
    WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
6
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
7
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
8
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbell University; the most unlike its peers is Anderson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $220,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINAUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILLNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITY+12 more: $88,500 · Other+12 moreCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $67,500 · EducationCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITYANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationANDERSON UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYWashington and Lee University: $30,000 · EducationWashington and Lee UniversityWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $27,500 · EducationWINGATE UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYCOKER UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · EducationNorth Central College: $7,500 · Education+1 more: $6,000 · Education
Other$406,000Education$221,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOKER UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central College: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds WINGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COKER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds North Central College ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lancaster County Partners for YouthSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lancaster County Partners for Youth · Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James Benjamin and Agnes M Liles Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James Benjamin and Agnes M Liles Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James Benjamin and Agnes M Liles’ filings →

    More from the funding graph