Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $105k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
6
’20
6
’21
4
’22
4
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.8MEducation$312kInternational$30kEnvironment$27kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$12kRecreation & Sports$10kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$75,000
UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION$10,000
UW-MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION$5,000
CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN$5,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$1,500
JDRF$1,500
DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND$1,200
FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JDRF RIDE TO CURE: $1k → 17%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UW - MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE: $10k → 3%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $200 → 14%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND: $2k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 3%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND: $2k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 3%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $2k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 3%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $2k → 17%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $1k → 17%CEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1.6M → 17%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3k → 17%FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $75k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $70k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $70k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $10k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $2k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $8k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$623k · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$623k
$1k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    Cherokee Ranch & Castle
    4× · 2019–2023 · $27k · revenue +116%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • JR
    JDRF RIDE TO CURE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating a cure for each and every multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies,…

Health
2
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
3
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
6
Lupus Research Alliance Inc

Putting people with lupus at the center of all we do, the lupus research alliance drives the discovery & development of next generation lupus diagnostics and curative treatments through innovative research & collaborations.

Health
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
9
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
10
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
11
Materials Research Society

The materials research society (mrs) is an organization of materials researchers worldwide that promotes communication for the advancement of interdisciplinary materials research and technology to improve the quality of life.

Community Improvement
12
Madison Community Foundation

Madison community foundation will engage greater madison in philanthropy to advance a more vibrant and equitable community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cherokee Ranch & Castle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1,570,074 · Community ImprovementCEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $270,000 · OtherIndividual grant …UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $52,000 · OtherUW-LACROSSE FOUND…+7 more: $12,600 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $215,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 · InternationalCherokee Ranch & Castle: $27,000 · EnvironmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$1,570,074Other$334,600Philanthropy$215,000International$30,000Environment$27,000Youth Development$12,000Arts & Culture$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1,570,074 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $215,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCherokee Ranch & Castle: $27,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Yvonne Ziemer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph