Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $105k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
19
6
20
6
21
4
22
4
23
2
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$1.8MEducation$312kInternational$30kEnvironment$27kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$12kRecreation & Sports$10kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$234
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$75,000
UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION$10,000
UW-MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION$5,000
CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN$5,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$1,500
JDRF$1,500
DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND$1,200
FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JDRF RIDE TO CURE: $1k → 17%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UW - MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE: $10k → 3%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $200 → 14%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND: $2k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 3%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND: $2k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 3%DAREN M HIDALGO MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 10%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $2k → 17%CHEROKEE RANCH & CASTLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 3%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $2k → 17%UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $1k → 17%CEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $1.6M → 17%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3k → 17%FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $75k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $70k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $70k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $10k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $2k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $8k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$623k · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$623k
$1k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    Cherokee Ranch & Castle
    4× · 2019–2023 · $27k · revenue +116%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • JR
    JDRF RIDE TO CURE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
3
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
7
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
8
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

9
Materials Research Society

The materials research society (mrs) is an organization of materials researchers worldwide that promotes communication for the advancement of interdisciplinary materials research and technology to improve the quality of life.

Community Improvement
10
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
11
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cherokee Ranch & Castle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,570,074 · Community ImprovementCEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCUW-MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION — $270,000 · OtherUW-MILWAUKEE FOUN…UW-LACROSSE FOUNDATION — $52,000 · OtherUW-LACROSSE FOUND…+7 more — $12,600 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $215,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $30,000 · InternationalCherokee Ranch & Castle — $27,000 · EnvironmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$1,570,074Other$334,600Philanthropy$215,000International$30,000Environment$27,000Youth Development$12,000Arts & Culture$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCEDAR STREET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,570,074 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $215,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCherokee Ranch & Castle — $27,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC — $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James and Yvonne Ziemer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph