· Private foundation
Jagdish & Meena Gupta Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of JAGDISH & MEENA GUPTA FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $25,000 |
| HOFSTRA MEDICAL COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| THE ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERI | $10,000 |
| AIA | $1,500 |
| THE ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERI | $1,500 |
| AAPI | $599 |
| AIA | $575 |
| A STITCH IN TIME | $501 |
| AIA | $500 |
| AAPI OF QUEENS AND LONG ISLAND INC | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| BAYRIDGE MEDICAL SOCIETY | $300 |
| OM FOUNDATION | $250 |
| AMERICAN CENTER FOR WELLNESS | $201 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAIA7× · 2019–2025 · $35k
- AOAAPI OF QUEENS AND LONG ISLAND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue -28%
- AAAPI6× · 2020–2025 · $24k
Funded once
- AOAIIMSONIANS OF AMERICAone grant, 2021 · $1k
- NDNARGIS DUTT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.
To foster and promote friendship and strategic partnership between united states and india usipf creates and enhances cultural, educational and economic awareness between the us and india and promotes collabration within these spehers.
Part 3, line 1 - organization mission american muslim physician of indian origin (ampi) is coopeating with health clinics in chicago, illinois, specifically physicans who are members of ampi, volunteer their time and talents to the…
To serve as a platform to assist indian american phyisician to excel in patient care,teaching and research; to pursue their aspirations in professional and community affairs; to be innovative thinkers and health care leader; and to…
Maintened a website to document and present our research, popular vedic popularvedicscience.com. added 200 new articles and the website is now a top ranking site
Assist domestic human trafficking, and organizations with a similar purpose. covid aid.
Public education
Increase awareness of indian political system in usa & to promote culture, heritage, arts and programs of india to the diaspora in the usa
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Om Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AAPI OF QUEENS AND LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF MEDICINE OF BROOKLYNINC ↗
- Who funds INDIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds FREE FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds OM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Indian American Forum ↗
- Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NASSAU COUNTY DENTAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arya Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jagdish & Meena Gupta Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.