Loading…
· Public charity
JACKSONVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND INC
Spark innovation, relationships and resources to achieve excellent outcomes for all students.
$233k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants
2
Communities
$99k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Education$1.3MOther$457k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
covid distancedistance learningprofessional learningleadership
2021
strategicplan
2022
duval
2023
duval
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $99k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- DUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$98,748
- DONORCHOOSE$25,000
- READ USA INC$22,550
- TEACH FOR AMERICA$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$610k · 3 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5688% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
4
Total granted
$610k
$1.1M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+5688%
+46%
Still filing today
67%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTEACHER OF THE YEAR GRANTS4× · 2020–2023 · $452k
- DDONORCHOOSE4× · 2020–2023 · $103k · revenue +30%
- RUREAD USA INC3× · 2020–2023 · $55k · revenue +5688%
Funded once
IMPACT FLORIDAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.1M · revenue +112% · 47% of their budget- BCBETHUNE COOKMAN UNIVERSITY2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue -3%
- WAWAYMAN ACADEMY OF THE ARTSone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Young Men's Christian Association
The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.
Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association
Carlisle family ymca is a charitable community service organization that offers programs designed for men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, ethnic groups and religions. our ymca was founded by volunteers, is led by…
Human Services
3
Young Men's Christian Association
The ymca is a fellowship of persons united in a common loyalty to jesus christ for the purpose of developing judeo-christian personality and building a society centered on judeo-christian values. formed to improve the quality of life…
Human Services
4
Young Men's Christian Association
The ymca of middletown is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families, and strong…
Human Services
5
Young Men's Christian Association
Put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
—
6
Young Men's Christian Association
Provide opportunties for individuals and families to grow in spirit, mind and body.
Human Services
7
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Waukesha County Inc
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy mind, spirit, and body
Recreation & Sports
8
University of Florida
To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.
Education
9
Young Americans
Youth Development
10
Central Florida Young Men's Christian
In 2024, the ymca of central florida advanced its mission through a range of impactful programs and services across six counties. more than 142,000 people engaged with the ymca through membership and programs, including youth development,…
Human Services
11
Young Mens Christian Association
We are the program of choice for inspiring youth to reach their full potential.
Human Services
12
Young Men's Christian Association of
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build character and promote a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Impact Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Young Men's Christian Association of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$1,264,074Other$457,080
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
The Community Foundation ForFL13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation For
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JACKSONVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IMPACT FLORIDA.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 611949614 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on IMPACT FLORIDA, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 47% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Jacksonville Public Education Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jacksonville Public Education Fund Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines