Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$209kHealth$95kFood & Nutrition$87kPublic Benefit$67kEducation$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$410k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jackson County Central JCC Schools$49,253
City of Jackson$21,245
Jackson Center for the Arts Inc$5,002
Jackson County Food For Kids$5,000
DesMoines Health Human Svc$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Supplies For Kids$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Lutheran Social Services: $5k → 14%Little Huskies Learning Center: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$539k · 20 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$539k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+24%

Still filing today

20%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    Jackson County Central JCC Schools
    7× · 2019–2025 · $195k
  • CO
    CITY OF JACKSON
    5× · 2021–2025 · $67k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2024 · $42k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • FS
    Food Shelf
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • SJ
    Sanford Jackson Medical Clinic
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Provisions of Jackson County

Community food pantry

Food & Nutrition
2
Jackson County Agricultural Society

The various income and expenes that are customary to the operation of a county fair including open class exhibits, youth programs, fees, and 4h clubs.

Recreation & Sports
3
Wimbledon Child Care Center

Provide Childcare Services in the Wimbledon, ND Area

—
4
Juneau Community Preschool Inc

Education

Education
5
Lake Mills Food Pantry Inc

Provide food and other necessary perishables to those in need in the area

Food & Nutrition
6
Cinder Care of Little Chute Inc

Provide daycare services for children of surrounding area.

—
7
Neillsville Area Food Pantry Inc

Emergency Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
8
Jordan Area Food Shelf

Provide Food for the poor.

Human Services
9
Faribault County Food Shelf

To provide food for people with low income within Faribault County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Deer River Area Food Shelf Inc

Provide food to low income and all needy people in the deer river mn area

Food & Nutrition
11
Long Prairie Emergency Food Pantry

Furnish needy famililes food

—
12
Polson Fairgrounds Inc

County fairgrounds maintenance

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson County Food 4 Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jackson County Agricultural Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jackson County Central JCC Schools: $194,570 · OtherJackson County Central JCC SchoolsCITY OF JACKSON: $66,853 · OtherCITY OF JACKSONIndividual grant recipient: $42,266 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJackson Community Foundation: $42,000 · OtherJackson Community FoundationJackson Volunteer Ambulance Service: $22,526 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · Other+34 more: $185,225 · Other+34 moreJACKSON FOOD SHELF INC: $18,500 · Food & NutritionJACKSON COUNTY FOOD 4 KIDS INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionBIO Girls Inc: $13,665 · Youth DevelopmentLITTLE HUSKIES LEARNING CENTER: $6,239 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 · Human ServicesJackson Center for the Arts: $10,002 · Arts & Culture
Other$574,440Food & Nutrition$32,500Youth Development$13,665Human Services$11,239Arts & Culture$10,002

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKSON FOOD SHELF INC: $18,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY FOOD 4 KIDS INC: $14,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetBIO Girls Inc: $13,665 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJackson Center for the Arts: $10,002 over 2y, 12% of budgetLITTLE HUSKIES LEARNING CENTER: $6,239 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJackson County Agricultural Society: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSacred Heart Mercy Health Care Center co Religious Sisters of Mercy: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWILD COMPASS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION: $2,540 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JACKSON FOOD SHELF INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY FOOD 4 KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIO Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE HUSKIES LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Jackson County Agricultural Society ↗
  • Who funds Sacred Heart Mercy Health Care Center co Religious Sisters of Mercy ↗
  • Who funds WILD COMPASS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert & Helen Remick Ch FoundationMN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert & Helen Remick Ch Foundation · Southwest Initiative Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jackson Health Care Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jackson Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph