Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jack Yanoff Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$344k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$288kHealth$270kHuman Services$230kPhilanthropy$151kFood & Nutrition$105kHousing & Shelter$105kPublic Benefit$86kPublic Safety & Disaster$50k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $239k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM OF MARIN$50,000
GREENLIGHT CLINIC$50,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO$30,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO$25,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISC$25,000
THE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION$25,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES$25,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$20,000
BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS$20,000
CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM OF MARIN$18,000
PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT$10,000
BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS$10,000
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK$10,000
DIGNITYMOVES$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $5k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $50k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Jack Yanoff Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jack Yanoff Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$965k · 11 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$965k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+28%

Still filing today

91%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPublic BenefitFood & NutritionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREENLIGHT CLINIC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +15%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +62%
  • RE
    REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • The Jewish Community Free Clinicgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
2
The Gerald S and Miriam M Friedkin Supporting Foundation

Supports charitable, educational, & religious purposes of jewish comm federation of sf.

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

4
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…

Human Services
6
Hebrew Free Loan of San Diego

Hebrew free loan of san diego fosters financial stability and opportunity among the jewish community of san diego county by providing access to affordable interest free loans with jewish values of compassion, kindness, and flexibility.…

7
Jewish Free Loan Association

The jewish free loan association of los angeles (jfla) offers interest-free loans on a non-sectarian basis to individuals and families whose needs are urgent and who may not qualify through normal financial resources. (see continuation on…

Unclassified
8
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
9
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
10
Libitzky Family Foundation

Supports charitable, educational, & religious purposes of jewish comm federation of sf.

Religion
11
Colen Family Foundation

Supports charitable, educational, & religious purposes of jewish comm federation of sf.

12
The Helen Diller Family Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Greenlight Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM OF MARIN — $268,000 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM OF MARINJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $80,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF …SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL — $20,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC+2 more — $20,000 · OtherGREENLIGHT CLINIC — $140,000 · HealthGREENLIGHT CLINICBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS — $100,000 · HealthBREAST CANCER PREVENTIO…The Jewish Community Free Clinic — $20,000 · HealthThe Jewish Community Fr…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $10,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $170,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CH…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $55,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CEN…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE JEWIS…DIGNITYMOVES — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterDIGNITYMO…REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $95,000 · Food & NutritionHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $75,500 · Public BenefitHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $26,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $25,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$438,000Health$270,000Human Services$230,000Housing & Shelter$105,000Food & Nutrition$95,000Public Benefit$75,500Philanthropy$71,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $170,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREENLIGHT CLINIC — $140,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS — $100,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $80,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $75,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITYMOVES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $26,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Jewish Community Free Clinic — $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends In Sonoma Helping Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · United Jewish Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack Yanoff Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph