Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

California · Public charity

Jack London Improvement District

Our mission is to create, promote and maintain an inviting environment for people who visit, live or work in the jack london district, and build an inclusive and resilient commercial community... (see schedule o)

$186k
Granted FY2023
11
Itemized grants FY2023
11
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$177k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$14,700
Largest grant, FY2023
$24,700
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$846k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rockridge District Association$24,700110%
Temescal Telegraph Avenue Community Association$20,00013%
Korea Town Oakland$20,00012%
Oakland Chinatown Improvement Council$20,00012%
Dimond Improvement Association$14,700111%
Montclair Village Association$14,70014%
Laurel District Association$14,70013%
Piedmont Avenue Merchants Associati On$13,0001n/a
Oakland Childrens Fairyland Inc$10,00010%
Lakeshore Avenue Business Improvement District$10,00015%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($15k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jack London Improvement District supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRockridge District Association: $24,700 over 1y, 10% of budgetTemescal Telegraph Avenue Community Association: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetKorea Town Oakland: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetOakland Chinatown Improvement Council: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDimond Improvement Association: $14,700 over 1y, 11% of budgetMontclair Village Association: $14,700 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetLaurel District Association: $14,700 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOakland Childrens Fairyland Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLakeshore Avenue Business Improvement District: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Compare Jack London Improvement District with peer funders

About Jack London Improvement District

How much does Jack London Improvement District give?
Jack London Improvement District reported 11 itemized grants totaling $176,500, out of $185,900 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Jack London Improvement District fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (94%), Recreation & Sports (6%).
Who are Jack London Improvement District's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Rockridge District Association ($25k), Temescal Telegraph Avenue Community Association ($20k), Korea Town Oakland ($20k).
Where is Jack London Improvement District based?
Jack London Improvement District is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack London Improvement District’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home