· Charitable trust
Jack Goldstein Charitable Trust
None
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+2 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,545,199 |
| KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,485,000 |
| CORNERSTONE FAMILY COUNSELING | $100,000 |
| MEADOWLARK HILLS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE MANHATTAN CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KSKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +107%
- WHWAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND2× · 2023–2024 · $750k · revenue +207%
- NSNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2023 · $70k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- FBFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue +50%
- BLBig Lakes Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +38%
- MCMANHATTAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +103%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
To raise and maintain funds to support mental health care for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.
The Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas servces the region by encouraging charitable giving benefiting the common good and the quality of life.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
To strengthen the university and communities that have touched the lives of wu alumni and friends, the mission of the washburn university charitable gift fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable…
To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…
The kansas city country club is a traditional, private, family-oriented country club dedicated to providing outstanding year-round dining, social and athletic activities to its members and their guests through superior services, staff and…
Meadowlark hills is each resident's home. we are committed to enhancing the quality of life by nurturing individuality, independence, values, and community.
The Greater Kansas City Community Foundation's mission is to improve the quality of life in Greater Kansas City by increasing charitable giving, educating and connecting donors to community needs they care about, and leading on critical…
Foster and support amateur sports competition
To enhance the life, culture, and community of South Central Kansas by connecting people who care with causes that matter.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Manhattan Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wareham Hall Renovation Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Manhattan Area Technical College Foundation ↗
- Who funds FLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE FAMILY COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds NO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEADOWLARK HILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds Big Lakes Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jack Goldstein Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jack Goldstein Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Jack Goldstein Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.