Skip to content
Jack and Shirley McIntyre Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jack and Shirley McIntyre Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$875k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$2.7MHealth$284kPhilanthropy$223kYouth Development$221kArts & Culture$209kFood & Nutrition$150kEducation$111kEnvironment$82kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $550k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$4,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$250,000
CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY$100,000
SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$85,000
LINCOLN THEATRE CENTER FOUNDATION$85,000
CLEAR LAKE ELEMENTARY PARENTS GROUP$70,000
THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SKAGIT COUNTY$60,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY$50,000
SACRED EARTH FOUNDATION$15,000
NW IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT$7,500
THE CENTER ON COLFAX$7,500
KAPPA DELTA FOUNDATION$5,000
SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$4,500
SVC FOUNDATION$3,500
MADDIE'S PLACE$3,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAITLIN'S SMILES: $2k → 12%CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $100k → 11%CHICK MISSION: $5k → 17%CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $100k → 11%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 12%YWCA OF WALLA WALLA: $3k → 13%CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $67k → 11%CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $45k → 11%SKAGIT VALLEY YMCA: $1.0M → 11%SKAGIT VALLEY YMCA: $500k → 11%SKAGIT VALLEY YMCA: $500k → 11%SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $250k → 11%CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $100k → 11%SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 13 repeat orgs$613k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
52

Total granted

$3.3M
$358k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+7%

Still filing today

85%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Skagit Valley Family YMCA
    3× · 2021–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +84%
  • CO
    CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $412k · revenue +21%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SV
    SKAGIT VALLEY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SW
    SEDRO WOOLLEY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $46k · revenue -13%
  • TF
    TRI-PARISH FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
4
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
5
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
6
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
7
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
8
Washington Women's Foundation

Washington women's foundation is a strong and inclusive collective of informed women who together influence community transformation through individual and collective discovery, high-impact grant making and by listening to and respecting…

Philanthropy
9
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
10
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
11
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
12
United Way of Skagit County

United Way of Skagit County's mission is to build a positive and sustainable quality of life for all.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Skagit Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
30/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Skagit Valley Family YMCA: $2,254,500 · Human ServicesThe Skagit Valley Family YMCACHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $412,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF THE VALLEY+5 more: $17,750 · Human ServicesSKAGIT VALLEY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · OtherSKAGIT VALLEY F…LINCOLN THEATRE CENTER FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherLINCOLN THEATRE…CLEAR LAKE ELEMENTARY PARENTS GROUP: $70,000 · OtherCLEAR LAKE ELEM…SEDRO WOOLLEY MUSEUM: $45,970 · OtherSEDRO WOOLLEY M…KAPPA DELTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherTRI-PARISH FOOD BANK: $25,000 · Other+50 more: $221,000 · Other+50 moreCAMP KOREY: $255,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP KOREYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…THE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $185,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $8,250 · PhilanthropySACRED EARTH FOUNDATION: $74,500 · Environment+3 more: $7,500 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSkagit Valley College Foundation: $8,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationRISE COLORADO: $6,500 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,000 · EducationCOMMUNICATION 4 ALL INC: $3,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · Education
Human Services$2,684,250Other$571,970Youth Development$455,000Philanthropy$193,250Environment$82,000Arts & Culture$61,000Education$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Skagit Valley Family YMCA: $2,254,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $412,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetCAMP KOREY: $255,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $200,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSACRED EARTH FOUNDATION: $74,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $60,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSkagit Valley College Foundation: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTANWOOD-CAMANO FOOD BANK SERVICES: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISE COLORADO: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBlue Mountain Heart to Heart: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND WALDORF SCHOOL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTANWOOD-CAMANO COMMUNITY FAIR: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPROTEZ FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInnovia Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ORGANIZATION FOR ANIMAL HELP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICK MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASHLEY HOUSE: $4,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $4,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLET ME RUN INC: $4,275 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES - DENVER CASA: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $3,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BLUE MOUNTAINS: $3,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WALLA WALLA: $3,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNICATION 4 ALL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $2,725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNTAINEERS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStanwood-Camano Area Foundation: $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIESFOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWild Orca: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAnacortes Small Boat Center DBA Anacortes Community Boating: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S GUILD ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationThe Skagit Community …Jerry H Walton Founda…The Norcliffe Foundat…Medina FoundationCredit Unions in the …The Albertsons Compan…School's Out Washingt…Employees Community F…Ferguson FoundationBnsf Railway Foundati…
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE39.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Skagit Community Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Medina Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · School's Out Washington · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Ferguson Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack and Shirley McIntyre Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack and Shirley McIntyre Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jack and Shirley McIntyre Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jack and Shirley McIntyre Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack and Shirley McIntyre’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home