Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

J Warren and Lois McClure Foundation

To support broad charitable purposes, primarily in the state of vermont.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$883k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$4.3MEmployment$587kYouth Development$227kReligion$130kCrime & Legal$90kPublic Benefit$79kPhilanthropy$60kCommunity Improvement$53kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $1,024,793 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,085,927 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $61,134 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $141k
  • $250k+1 grant · $883k
$25,410
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT - MONTPELIER$883,383
CAREERS CLIC$38,000
VERMONT RURAL EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE$35,000
VERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION$25,410
GREAT SCHOOLS PARTNERSHIP$20,000
ORANGE SOUTHWEST SUPERVISORY UNION$13,000
VERMONT HUMANITIES$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of J Warren and Lois McClure Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

J Warren and Lois McClure Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.4M · 19 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$5.4M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+38%

Still filing today

79%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Careers CLiC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +2%
  • VA
    VERMONT AFTERSCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $90k · revenue +231%
  • VY
    VERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $86k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • PA
    PUBLIC ASSETS INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $33k · revenue +49%
  • WR
    WINDHAM REGIONAL CAREER CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • BP
    BURLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermont Superintendents Association Inc

Promote quality public education

2
Vermont Council On World Affairs Inc

See schedule othe mission of the vermont council on world affairs is to promote awareness and understanding of the world and its people, places and cultures through education and engagement. the future of vermont depends upon the world…

3
Voices for Vermonts Children

To promote public policy that enhances the lives of children and youth in vermont.

4
Vermont Association of Business

It is Vabirs mission to help employers meet their staffing needs for a stable skilled Workforce and to advocate public and private policies that encourage and increase access for persons with disabilities in the work environment.

Employment
5
Alliance for a Better Vermont

Conducts and coordinates research of critical issues affecting vermonters. also conducts public opinion research.

6
Vermont Businesses for Social Responsibility Research & Edu Fdn

To provide research and education on issues of importance to the natural, human, and economic environments of vermont citizens.

Education
7
Cooperation Vermont

The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.

Community Improvement
8
Vermont Energy Education Program Inc

To build a deep understanding of energy and climate through education, inspiring and empowering people to take action for increased sustainability in our communities, economy and environment.

Education
9
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
10
Vermont Employee Ownership Center

To promote and foster employee ownership in Vermont.

Education
11
Vermont Council On Rural Development Inc

The Vermont Council on Rural Development helps Vermont citizens build prosperous and resilient communities through democratic engagement, marshalling resources, and collective action.

Community Improvement
12
Vermont Energy Investment Corporation

Veic is a sustainable energy company on a mission to generate the energy solutions the world needs (continues in schedule o). (continued), working to combat the climate crisis, boost community resilience, and lower energy costs. for nearly…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Afterschool Inc and the most unlike its peers is Synergy Learning International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Trade Associat…Healthcare Captive InsuranceEarly Childhood Care and Ed…Community Media AccessVermont Community Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%0%<5yr12%7%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr21%26%20–35yr15%30%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr12%4%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr21%32%20–35yr15%37%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
9%
336/3,795

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
26/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT - MONTPELIER — $4,144,394 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT - MONTPELIERVERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORP — $270,010 · OtherVERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORP+19 more — $358,600 · Other+19 moreCareers CLiC — $163,000 · EducationCareers C…VERMONT SCHOOL COUNSELOR ASSOCIATION — $130,000 · EducationVERMONT S…VERMONT RURAL EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC — $85,000 · EducationVERMONT R…Great Schools Partnership Inc — $30,000 · EducationGreat Sch…UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP FOR LEARNING INC — $24,000 · Education+4 more — $36,100 · Education+4 moreVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementBRATTLEBORO DEVELOPMENT CREDIT CORP — $35,000 · Community ImprovementREGION VI WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $85,617 · EnvironmentSHELBURNE FARMS — $5,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT AFTERSCHOOL INC — $89,938 · InternationalTHE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $85,000 · PhilanthropySPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesVERMONT PROFESSIONALS OF COLOR NETWORK — $15,000 · Human Services
Other$4,773,004Education$468,100Community Improvement$102,500Environment$90,617International$89,938Philanthropy$85,000Human Services$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCareers CLiC — $163,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetVERMONT AFTERSCHOOL INC — $89,938 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $85,617 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVERMONT RURAL EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC — $85,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetTHE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC — $60,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetVERMONT PRINCIPALS ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBRATTLEBORO DEVELOPMENT CREDIT CORP — $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPUBLIC ASSETS INSTITUTE INC — $32,600 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetGreat Schools Partnership Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGOVERNOR'S INSTITUTES OF VERMONT — $24,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP FOR LEARNING INC — $24,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetVERMONT BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetVERMONT ADULT LEARNING INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVERMONT JOURNALISM TRUST LTD — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE DREAM PROGRAM INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVERMONT PROFESSIONALS OF COLOR NETWORK — $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetVERMONT HUMANITIES COUNCIL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVBR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetVERMONT SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTLAND REGION EDUCATION CORP — $7,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSYNERGY LEARNING INTERNATIONAL INC — $7,500 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetREGION VI WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT56.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Alchemist Foundation Inc · The Bay and Paul Foundations Inc · The Windham Foundation Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · George W Mergens Foundation · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · Harris & Frances Block Foundation Inc · Let's Grow Kids Inc · Vermont Afterschool Inc · Francis T & Louis T Nichols Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Warren and Lois McClure Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 42%
  • The Dream Program Inc100% of income from government
  • Vermont Adult Learning Inc78% of income from government
  • Vermont Humanities Council67% of income from government
  • Mentor Vermont Inc58% of income from government
  • Vermont Works for Women Inc52% of income from government
  • Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc47% of income from government
  • Vermont Rural Education Collaborative Inc43% of income from government
  • Vermont Afterschool Inc42% of income from government
  • Vermont Principals Association Inc19% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Development Credit Corp17% of income from government
  • Governor's Institutes of Vermont15% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms3% of income from government
  • Vermont School Boards Association1% of income from government
  • Vermont Journalism Trust Ltd0% of income from government
  • The Vermont Community Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J Warren and Lois McClure Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J Warren and Lois McClure Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph