Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$30kPhilanthropy$22kInternational$6kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kCrime & Legal$3kCivil Rights$3kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LI HEAD INJURY ASSOC INC$5,850
UJA - FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA$4,500
THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH$3,500
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$2,000
UJA - FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS$1,800
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH$1,500
JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION$1,500
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER$1,200
THE SAFE CENTER OF LI$1,000
THE BROOKE JACKMAN FOUNDATION INC$1,000
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS$500
THE CHILD CENTER OF NY$500
GLEN OAKS CLUB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION$500
BIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATION$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS' ASSOC: $250 → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS' ASSOC: $150 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 80%.

J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 16 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$73k
$2k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthPhilanthropyEducationInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +39%
  • TF
    THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +42%
  • TB
    THE BROOKE JACKMAN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • NF
    NFT FLORIDA TRANSPLANT FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • NL
    NS LI JEWISH HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2017 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
3
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
4
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
5
Northwell Health Stern Family Center for Reha

The mission is to enable residents to be independent through short-term rehabilitation, and to provide extended care to those who need it regardless of ability to pay.

Health
6
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
7
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
8
Ackerman Institute for the Family

The institute is dedicated to the study, diagnosis and treatment of family relationship problems

Health
9
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
10
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
11
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
12
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family and Children's Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Brooke Jackman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LI HEAD INJURY ASSOC INC: $18,050 · OtherLI HEAD INJURY ASSOC INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA: $5,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVAJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $5,500 · OtherJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $3,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACHTHE SAFE CENTER OF LI: $3,000 · OtherTHE SAFE CENTER OF LITHE BROOKE JACKMAN FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · OtherTHE BROOKE JACKMAN FOUNDATION INCUJA - FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS: $1,800 · Other+6 more: $6,350 · Other+6 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-…THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $8,000 · HealthTHE FEINSTEIN …Jupiter Medical Center Inc: $2,200 · HealthJupiter Medica…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,000 · Civil RightsLONG ISLAND CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $970 · InternationalFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $400 · Human Services
Other$46,700Philanthropy$15,000Health$10,200Civil Rights$3,000Education$1,500International$970Human Services$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKE JACKMAN FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $970 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKE JACKMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J Robert and Barrie C Blumenthal’s filings →

More from the funding graph