Skip to content

· Private foundation

J K Barker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$213kReligion$165kAnimals$149kArts & Culture$141kEducation$122kHousing & Shelter$93kPhilanthropy$61kFood & Nutrition$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $119k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN THE BAPTIST GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$19,250
RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE$10,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA$10,000
DISCALCED CARMELITE NUNS$10,000
OMAHA WORLD-HERALD GOODFELLOWS$10,000
DISCONNECT COLLECTIVE INC$10,000
SERVING SENIORS$10,000
GOLDEN RETRIVEVER RESCUE IN NEBRASKA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO$10,000
KITCHENS FOR GOOD$10,000
SCIENCE DELIVERED$8,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$7,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $10k → 17%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $5k → 14%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $5k → 17%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $5k → 14%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $5k → 17%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $10k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $10k → 12%SERVING SENIORS: $10k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $10k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $10k → 11%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $250 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $7k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $5k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $5k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $5k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $5k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 42 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+16%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +24%
  • EO
    ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +31%
  • SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +32%
  • HH
    HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
2
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
3
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
6
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
7
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
8
Humane Society of Scott County

The humane society of scott county provides humane care for all lost, abandoned and unwanted pets in scott county, to adopt these pets to caring, responsible, life-long homes, and to educate the community about responsible pet ownership.

Animals
9
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
10
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
11
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Vincent De Paul Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hooves & Paws Rescue of the Heartland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN THE BAPTIST GREEK: $84,517 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST GREEKIndividual grant recipient: $70,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $68,618 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUEGOLDEN RETRIVEVER RESCUE IN NEBRASKA: $50,015 · OtherGOLDEN RETRIVEVER RESCUE IN NEBRASKAIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDISCALCED CARMELITE NUNS: $35,000 · OtherNET: $34,505 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $33,500 · OtherFILM STREAMS INC: $31,000 · OtherKITHCHENS FOR THE GOOD: $30,750 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $30,287 · OtherDISCONNECT COLLECTIVE INC: $28,000 · Other+19 more: $190,691 · Other+19 moreDONORSCHOOSEORG: $61,855 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $54,500 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE …SCIENCE DELIVERED: $31,000 · EducationSCIENCE DELIVERE…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $25,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS…MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $20,000 · EducationMONARCH SCHOOL P…+1 more: $65 · EducationELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $60,900 · Human ServicesELDERHELP OF SA…SERVING SENIORS: $30,000 · Human ServicesSERVING SENIORSOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $27,500 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSI…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAG…BEYOND BEDTIME INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND BEDTIME …LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN CHURCH…+1 more: $3,250 · Human ServicesGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE IN NEBRASKA INC: $30,000 · AnimalsNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsLIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $10,500 · AnimalsHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsHooves & Paws Rescue Of The Heartland: $9,525 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $6,316 · AnimalsSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $5,000 · AnimalsOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $45,000 · Community ImprovementRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $20,000 · HealthLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthLAUGHING PONY RESCUE: $8,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$732,683Education$192,420Human Services$171,650Animals$91,341Community Improvement$45,000Health$43,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $61,855 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $60,900 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $54,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSCIENCE DELIVERED: $31,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSERVING SENIORS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE IN NEBRASKA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBEYOND BEDTIME INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $15,323 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $11,845 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHooves & Paws Rescue Of The Heartland: $9,525 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAUGHING PONY RESCUE: $8,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $6,316 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $3,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE DELIVERED ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE IN NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BEDTIME INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIONS TIGERS AND BEARS ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hawks FoundationNE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hawks Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Country Friends · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Oliver & Ferrol Barklage Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J K Barker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J K Barker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J K Barker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to J K Barker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J K Barker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph