Skip to content

California · Private foundation

J & M Lam Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
25%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$33,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 13
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$877k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 25% of the organizations J & M Lam Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$44k50%
FY20244$40k25%
FY20235$36k20%
FY20225$33k20%
FY202110$30k80%
FY202013$25k54%
FY20199$22k67%
FY20177$14kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$89kFood & Nutrition$72kHuman Services$26kHealth$25kReligion$15kCommunity Improvement$4kEducation$3kInternational$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
River of Life Foundation$72,00050%
Chinese Newcomers Service Center$16,30041%
Chinese Hospital Association$11,70030%
Archdiocese of San Francisco Ca$5,0005n/a
River of Life Church Inc$5,0001n/a
Family Bridges Inc$4,50030%
University of California San Francisco Foundation$3,00010%
San Bruno Chinese Church$2,0001n/a
San Jose Christian Alliance Church of Christian & Missionary Alliance$1,8002n/a
Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall$1,50020%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of J & M Lam Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
River of Life Foundation$72,00050%
Chinese Newcomers Service Center$16,30041%
Chinese Hospital Association$11,70030%
Archdiocese of San Francisco Ca$5,0005n/a
River of Life Church Inc$5,0001n/a
Family Bridges Inc$4,50030%
University of California San Francisco Foundation$3,00010%
San Bruno Chinese Church$2,0001n/a
San Jose Christian Alliance Church of Christian & Missionary Alliance$1,8002n/a
Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall$1,50020%
Millbrae Education Foundation Inc$1,30020%
The Salvation Army$1,1901n/a
Love and Conflict Peacemaking Ministries$1,00011%
Millbrae Meadows PTO$1,00011%
Chinatown Community Development Center$60010%
Chinese Christian Mission Inc$20020%

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($116k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget J & M Lam Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRiver of Life Foundation: $72,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetChinese Newcomers Service Center: $16,300 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetChinese Hospital Association: $11,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Bridges Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of California San Francisco Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMillbrae Education Foundation Inc: $1,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLove and Conflict Peacemaking Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMillbrae Meadows PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetChinatown Community Development Center: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChinese Christian Mission Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Bay AreaCA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Bay Area · The San Francisco Foundation · Pov & May Tov Family Foundation · Shp Christian Foundation · San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation · Asian Pacific Fund · Cathay Bank Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare J & M Lam Family Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J & M Lam Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J & M Lam Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About J & M Lam Family Foundation

How much does J & M Lam Family Foundation give?
J & M Lam Family Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $44,050 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does J & M Lam Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (37%), Food & Nutrition (30%), Human Services (11%).
Who are J & M Lam Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: River of Life Foundation ($72k), Chinese Newcomers Service Center ($16k), Chinese Hospital Association ($12k).
Does J & M Lam Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does J & M Lam Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as J & M Lam Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Way of the Bay Area, The San Francisco Foundation, Pov & May Tov Family Foundation.
Where is J & M Lam Family Foundation based?
J & M Lam Family Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J & M Lam Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph